Evidence based guidelines for complex regional pain syndrome type 1
© Perez et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 10 July 2009
Accepted: 31 March 2010
Published: 31 March 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Jul 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Jul 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Roberto Perez|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Jul 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Raneem Albazaz|
|14 Sep 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Rothbotham|
|30 Nov 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Roberto Perez|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Nov 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Raneem Albazaz|
|17 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Roberto Perez|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|17 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|29 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Roberto Perez|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|29 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|31 Mar 2010||Editorially accepted|
|31 Mar 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2377-10-20|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.