The determinants of stroke phenotypes were different from the predictors (CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc) of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive approach
© Oh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 9 June 2011
Accepted: 24 August 2011
Published: 24 August 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Jun 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jane Caldwell|
|8 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Bunch|
|26 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Oh Young Bang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jane Caldwell|
|8 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Bunch|
|12 Aug 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Oh Young Bang|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Aug 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Aug 2011||Editorially accepted|
|24 Aug 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2377-11-107|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.