Post-stroke infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Willeke F Westendorp1,

    Affiliated with

    • Paul J Nederkoorn1,

      Affiliated with

      • Jan-Dirk Vermeij1,

        Affiliated with

        • Marcel G Dijkgraaf2 and

          Affiliated with

          • Diederik van de Beek1, 3Email author

            Affiliated with

            BMC Neurology201111:110

            DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-110

            Received: 19 May 2011

            Accepted: 20 September 2011

            Published: 20 September 2011

            Abstract

            Background

            stroke is the main cause of disability in high-income countries, and ranks second as a cause of death worldwide. Patients with acute stroke are at risk for infections, but reported post-stroke infection rates vary considerably. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled post-stroke infection rate and its effect on outcome.

            Methods

            MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies on post-stroke infection. Cohort studies and randomized clinical trials were included when post-stroke infection rate was reported. Rates of infection were pooled after assessment of heterogeneity. Associations between population- and study characteristics and infection rates were quantified. Finally, we reviewed the association between infection and outcome.

            Results

            87 studies were included involving 137817 patients. 8 studies were restricted to patients admitted on the intensive care unit (ICU). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (P < 0.001, I2 = 97%). The overall pooled infection rate was 30% (24-36%); rates of pneumonia and urinary tract infection were 10% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-10%) and 10% (95%CI 9-12%). For ICU studies, these rates were substantially higher with 45% (95% CI 38-52%), 28% (95%CI 18-38%) and 20% (95%CI 0-40%). Rates of pneumonia were higher in studies that specifically evaluated infections and in consecutive studies. Studies including older patients or more females reported higher rates of urinary tract infection. Pneumonia was significantly associated with death (odds ratio 3.62 (95%CI 2.80-4.68).

            Conclusions

            Infection complicated acute stroke in 30% of patients. Rates of pneumonia and urinary tract infection after stroke were 10%. Pneumonia was associated with death. Our study stresses the need to prevent infections in patients with stroke.

            Background

            Infection is a common complication in the acute phase after stroke. Reported infection rates after stroke vary considerably, ranging 5-65%. Differences in patient populations, study design and definition of infection may account for these large variations in post stroke infection rates [1]. However, a reliable pooled estimate of the infection rate in patients with stroke is lacking. Pneumonia is the most common post-stroke infection and been associated with a relative risk of 3.0 for mortality in a study including 14293 patients with stroke [2]. Consequently, new treatment strategies, i.e. preventive antibiotics, are currently under investigation [3]. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we calculated the pooled post-stroke infection rates, identified study and population characteristics associated with infection, and estimated the impact of pneumonia on outcome after stroke.

            Methods

            Selection of studies

            Cohort studies and randomized clinical trials (RCT) on ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with reported rates of infections in the acute phase were included. In- and exclusion criteria are listed in Additional File 1: Table S1. A literature search in MEDLINE (1950 to present) and EMBASE (1980 to present) was performed without language restrictions (Additional File 1: Table S2). Cross references were checked and experts in the field were consulted. Infection was defined according to the criteria used in included studies. Studies including a small subgroup of patients, i.e., those restricted to patients with dysphagia, were excluded to minimize selection bias. If two publications described one similar patient group data was used only once; this occurred three times [49]. If studies reported data of different treatment arms separately, these were also included as separate groups in our analysis [10, 11]. Treatment arms in randomized controlled trials on preventive antibiotic therapy were excluded, since this is likely to influence infection rate and is not part of standard stroke care [12].

            Data extraction

            Two independent observers (WFW and JDV) extracted data from selected articles according to predefined definitions. Disagreement was resolved by discussion.

            Overall infection rate and rate of pneumonia and urinary tract infection - the most common post-stroke infections - were extracted [13]. When percentages were given, these were converted into absolute numbers. We did not calculate an overall infection rate in each study by adding data on different infections, because of the possibility of two infections occurring in one patient.

            We also extracted the study characteristics prospective design, consecutive enrollment, type of stroke, study aim on infection and observation period. Population characteristics extracted were income country, age, gender, ICU study, infarction or bleeding, stroke severity, lowered consciousness, dysphagia and urinary incontinence/retention. Definitions can be found in Additional File 1: Table S3.

            Analyses

            For each study we calculated the proportion of overall infection, pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Next, these proportions were pooled using Review Manager to obtain one estimate for each infection. A fixed or random effects model was chosen after tests of heterogeneity (heterogeneity was defined with p-value < 0.05). Subgroup analysis was performed on Intensive Care Unit (ICU) vs. non-ICU studies. Subsequently, we performed univariate analyses investigating the association between population and study characteristics and the pooled proportion of infection, pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Pearson or Spearman correlation, Students T-Test, Mann-Whitney U Test or 1-way ANOVA were used when appropriate. Characteristics with a p-value < 0.10 were included in a multivariate regression analysis. To transform the proportion of pneumonia and urinary tract infection in a normally distributed variable we used arc sin-square root and square root transformations. Review Manager 5 and SPSS (version 16.0) were used for the statistical analyses.

            Results

            Included studies

            Figure 1 summarizes the study selection process. 87 studies were included involving 137817 patients. 8 studies included patients admitted on the ICU and 79 studies included patients admitted on stroke-unit, medium care facility or ward (non-ICU studies). Reasons for exclusion are noted in Additional File 1: Table S4. Not all characteristics could be extracted from all studies: age was reported in 77 studies; gender in 80; observation period in 73; stroke severity in 21; lowered consciousness in 25; urinary incontinence/retention in 6; and dysphagia in 26 studies. All extracted data is shown Additional File 2: Table S1.
            http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2377-11-110/MediaObjects/12883_2011_515_Fig1_HTML.jpg
            Figure 1

            Flowchart of study selection.

            Pooled infection rates

            Infection rates were evaluated in all 87 studies (Table 1). Pooled values were calculated in a random effects model because of significant heterogeneity between studies (P < 0.001, I2 = 97%). The overall pooled infection rate was 30% (95%CI 24-36%). The pooled pneumonia rate was 10% (95%CI 9-10%) and of urinary tract infection 10% (95%CI 9-12%). In ICU studies, overall infection rate was 45% (95%CI 38-52%) and rates of pneumonia and urinary tract infection were 28% (95%CI 18-38%) and 20% (95%CI 0-40%). In non-ICU studies, overall infection rate was 28% (95%CI 22-34%) and rates of pneumonia and urinary tract infection were 9% (95%CI 9-10%) and 10% (95%CI 8-11%).
            Table 1

            Pooled infection rates in 137817 patients with stroke

             

            All studies

            ICU studies

            Non-ICU studies

            No. of included studies

            87

            8

            79

            No. of evaluated patients

            137817

            871

            136946

            Infection rates

            % (95%CI)

            % (95%CI)

            % (95%CI)

            All infections

            30 (24-36)

            45% (38-52%)

            28% (22-34%)

            Pneumonia

            10 (9-10)

            28% (18-38%)

            9% (9-10%)

            Urinary tract infection

            10 (9-12)

            20% (0-40%)

            10% (8-11%)

            Footnote Table 1: CI denotes confidence interval

            Associations with population- and study characteristics

            Associations between population and study characteristics with infection rates are noted in Table 2 and 3. In univariate analysis, infection rate was higher in ICU-studies (P = 0.05) and in studies with a longer observation period (P = 0.03); a trend towards significance was seen for lowered consciousness (P = 0.06). We did not perform multivariate analysis for infection, because few studies reported all 3 variables. In the subgroup of non-ICU studies, an even stronger association was seen for observation period (P = 0.003).
            Table 2

            Univariate analysis between study or population characteristics and reported infection rates

            Study/population characteristic*

            No. of studies

            No. of evaluated patients

            P-value

            Study design

               

               Prospective design

            18

            9174

            0.82

               Consecutive enrollment

            18

            9174

            0.42

               Study aim on infection

            18

            9174

            0.89

               Observation period

            17

            8844

            0.03

            Population characteristics

               

               Income country

            18

            9174

            0.94

               Age

            18

            9174

            0.35

               Gender

            18

            9174

            0.86

               ICU population

            18

            9174

            0.05

               Infarction of bleeding

            18

            9174

            0.15

               Stroke severity (NIHSS)

            5

            1818

            0.14

               Lowered consciousness

            6

            2365

            0.06

               Dysphagia

            6

            395

            0.97

            Footnote Table 2: definitions of characteristics can be found in Additional File 1: Table S3

            Table 3

            Univariate analysis between study or population characteristics and reported pneumonia rates

            Study/population characteristic*

            No. of studies

            No. of evaluated patients

            P-value

            Study design

               

               Prospective design

            87

            137779

            0.02

               Consecutive enrollment

            87

            137779

            0.005

               Study aim on infection

            87

            137779

            0.004

               Observation period

            73

            102280

            0.37

            Population characteristics

               

               Income country

            87

            137779

            0.23

               Age

            77

            118755

            0.30

               Gender

            80

            132750

            0.76

               ICU population

            87

            137779

            0.001

               Infarction of bleeding

            87

            137779

            0.13

               Stroke severity (NIHSS)

            20

            31493

            0.01

               Lowered consciousness

            25

            52939

            0.001

               Dysphagia

            26

            17937

            0.19

            Footnotes Table 3: *definitions of characteristics can be found in Additional File 1: Table S3

            The rate of pneumonia was higher in ICU studies (P = 0.001), prospective studies (P = 0.02), studies that specifically evaluated infections (P = 0.004), studies with consecutive enrollment (P = 0.005), studies with a higher stroke severity (P = 0.01) and studies with higher proportions of patients with a lowered consciousness (P = 0.001). Stroke severity was closely related to ICU-study (Mann-Whitney U, Z -2,154, P = 0.02). In multivariate analysis pneumonia rate was associated with study characteristics: ICU studies (B 0.207, standard error (se) 0.042, P < 0.01), study aim on infection (B 0.062, se 0.026, P = 0.02), consecutive enrollment (B 0.058, se 0.024, P = 0.02). Stroke severity and lowered consciousness were excluded from this multivariate analysis since these characteristics were only reported in a relatively small number of studies. In non-ICU studies, rate of pneumonia was also higher in studies that specifically evaluated infections (B 0.06, se 0.025, P = 0.02) and studies with consecutive enrollment (B 0.065, se 0.022, P = 0.005) in multivariate analysis. No associations were found between age (P = 0.18) or dysphagia (P = 0.16) and pneumonia rate.

            The rate of urinary tract infections was higher in studies with a higher stroke severity (P = 0.01), a lower proportion of male patients (P = 0.005), prospective studies (P = 0.02) and in studies with a longer observation period (P = 0.10). A trend towards significance was seen for studies with a higher mean age (P = 0.08). In multivariate analysis, advanced age was independently associated with urinary tract infection (B 0.008, se 0.004, P = 0.04). Gender was associated with urinary tract infection, but only in a sub analysis of non-ICU studies (B -0,341, se 0.164, P = 0.04).

            Outcome

            To estimate the effect of post-stroke infection on outcome we pooled the mortality rates in patients with and without infection of the studies reporting these rates. Of all patients with an infection, 48% died vs. 18% of patients without infection (N = 1839; OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.63 - 2.67). Mortality rates were also higher in patients with pneumonia (26% vs. 5%, N = 16433; OR 5.58, 95% CI 4.76, 6.55) and a little higher in patients with urinary tract infection (12% vs. 10%, N = 2528; OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.76, 1.66). Since this data was not corrected for potential confounders, we also estimated the effect of pneumonia on death by pooling corrected odds ratios (OR) in a random effects model. This meta-analysis included four studies (19971 patients) and resulted in an OR in-hospital mortality of 3.62 (95% CI 2.80-4.68) (Figure 2). Five studies reported corrected OR of pneumonia for unfavorable outcome (Table 4); meta-analysis was not performed because of differences in outcome measure and follow-up. These studies showed an increased risk of unfavorable outcome in post-stroke patients with pneumonia. Urinary tract infection had no association with death according to four studies reporting on this [1417]. Three studies evaluated the effect on functional outcome for urinary tract infection, two studies showed an association with poor outcome in multivariate analysis [14, 18, 19]. OR's for unfavorable functional outcome were 2.72 (95% CI 4.73-11.84) and 3.1 (95% CI 1.6-5.9).
            http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2377-11-110/MediaObjects/12883_2011_515_Fig2_HTML.jpg
            Figure 2

            Pooled odds ratios: effect of pneumonia on in-hospital mortality.

            Table 4

            Effect of pneumonia on functional outcome

            Study

            No. of patients

            Outcome

            (modified Rankin Scale)

            OR

            (95% CI)

            Correction for

            confounders

            Vermeij et al [1]

            521

            > 2 at discharge

            > 2 at 1 year

            9.5 (1.7-52)

            10.95 (2.2-46)

               Yes

            Hong et al [18]

            1254

               3-6 at 3 months

            4.44 (2.20-8.99)

               Yes

            Huang et al [46]

            66

               < 3 at 1 month

            0.50 (0.38-0.64)

               No

            Ovbiagele [16]

            663

               0-3 at discharge

            0.16 (0.09-0.29)

               Yes

            Aslanyan et al [14]

            1455

               ≥ 2 at 3 months

            3.4 (1.4-8.3)

               Yes

            Discussion

            This meta-analysis shows that infections commonly complicate the acute phase after stroke. The pooled overall infection rate was 30% and pneumonia and urinary tract infections occurred each in 10% of patients. Previous studies showed a wide range of post-stroke infection rates, from 5%- 65% for infections, 1%-33% for pneumonia, and 2%-27% for urinary tract infection [1, 20]. This meta-analysis included a large number of patients and therefore provides a reliable estimate of infection after stroke.

            We identified several study and population characteristics that were associated with infection rate. Given the prevalence of pneumonia and urinary tract infection in general wards in Dutch hospitals - 1.1% and 1.7% respectively - our findings confirm that infection rate in patients in the acute phase of stroke is high [21]. This increased vulnerability of patients in the acute phase of stroke for infections can be attributed to different factors.

            First, infection was associated with study characteristics. Studies aimed on infection and those with consecutive enrolment were associated with higher infection rate. Possibly, these studies benefit of more rigorous detection of infection. Rate of infection was also higher in studies with a longer observation time. In a prospective observational study, most post stroke infections occurred within three days of hospital admission [1]. Nevertheless, 25% of infections occurred after these three days. Also, most urinary tract infections occur after 48 hours, i.e. most UTI's are hospital acquired, and therefore it seems logical that a longer observation time yielded a higher urinary tract infection rate in our study [17]. The absence of an association between observation time and pneumonia is not surprising. Pneumonia is mostly diagnosed within the first days following a stroke, both in studies performed on general wards as well as ICU's [1, 13, 2224].

            Microbiologic data of patients with post-stroke pneumonia shows a pattern of mostly early onset nosocomial pneumonia, or a community acquired aspiration syndrome. Staphylococcus aureus and gram-negative bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli or Enterobacter spp. were commonly identified; also Streptococcus species are occasionally found. Gram-negative bacteria and Staphylococcus aureus are known to cause pneumonia by aspiration of endogenous material from the colonized oropharynx [25, 26]. These pathogens are often seen in nosocomial infections [27]. Streptococcus species is still the most detected pathogen in community acquired pneumonia [28]. In stroke patients, it could be a cause of 'community acquired aspiration pneumonia', with aspiration occurring at the stroke ictus [29]. Often, no causative organism is detected in post-stroke pneumonia. Yield of cultures is usually not very high in patients with pneumonia; collection of material could be even more difficult in stroke patients due to neurologic deficit or lowered level of consciousness. Also, some cases of suspected pneumonia could in fact be a non-infectious aspiration pneumonitis, or the infection could be caused by anaerobic bacteria that require special culturing techniques. However, the role of anaerobic bacteria in the development of pneumonia is unclear [29, 30].

            Second, infection rate was associated with the patients' clinical condition. Studies including patients with a higher stroke severity or lower levels of consciousness showed higher infection rates, in particular for pneumonia. This effect corresponds with previous studies that often report both characteristics as risk factors for pneumonia [14, 31, 32]. Risk for aspiration is increased in these patients due to the absence of protective reflexes, and this risk is related to the degree of consciousness impairment [33]. Most stroke related pneumonias are believed to result from dysphagia and subsequent aspiration of oropharyngeal material or gastric content. A systematic review by Martino et al showed that dysphagia occurs in 37- 78% of stroke patients and increases the risk for pneumonia 3-fold and 11-fold in patients with confirmed aspiration [34]. However, up to half of patients with post stroke pneumonia do not aspirate, which implies that also other mechanisms are involved, e.g., stroke-induced immunodepression which is discussed below [2].

            We also found higher infection rates in ICU studies. Patients admitted to an ICU generally suffer from more severe strokes and also the frequency of invasive procedures is higher [15, 24, 32, 35]. The use of invasive procedures - i.e. urinary catheterization or mechanical ventilation in ICU patients - increase infection risk by facilitating the entry of a pathogen [17, 35].

            We identified a higher age and female sex as risk factors for urinary tract infection. Both of these characteristics have previously been reported as risk factors for urinary tract infection [16, 17]. Studies frequently report urinary catheterization as an important risk factor; we could not investigate this association because this characteristic was mostly not reported [17]. Advanced age as risk factor for post-stroke infection has been reported previously [16].

            In addition to above mentioned characteristics, acute stroke may lead to stroke-induced immunodepression, a systemic anti-inflammatory response that is related to susceptibility to infection [20, 36, 37]. This anti-inflammatory response was found in different clinical studies in acute stroke patients, and includes an excessive counter-inflammatory cytokine responses and impairments in cell-mediated immunity [38]. Certain features of this response - i.e., reduced lymphocyte count, delay in the recovery of T-lymphocyte loss - were more pronounced in patients developing post stroke infections [37, 39]. These results suggest that immunological changes could facilitate infection in acute stroke.

            Outcome is affected by post-stroke infections, as shown in our review. Pneumonia and urinary tract infection both increase the risk for unfavorable outcome and pneumonia is associated with mortality with an OR of 3.62. Infections could affect outcome in several ways. Firstly, they lead to immobilization, general frailty and a delay in rehabilitation due to prolonged hospital stay [1, 40]. More importantly, immunological effects of infections could worsen outcome. Evidence from experimental studies suggests that infection promotes antigen presentation and autoimmunity against the brain [41]. However, the evidence on this topic is scarce and the exact pathofysiology remains to be investigated.

            Our systematic review has limitations. First, results are limited by publication bias. Data was derived from randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and stroke registries; infection rate could differ in hospitals without stroke research or complication registries. Second, included studies were heterogeneous in definition of infection, which was based on clinical grounds and in some cases not described. A standardized definition for infection - as described by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [42] - is preferred since stricter criteria could permit identification of fewer infections. Next, not all relevant characteristics - for example use of antibiotics, differences in primary stroke care or use of a urinary catheter - could be evaluated, due to lack of data in included studies. Some of these characteristics have previously been described as a risk factor for infection and could have confounded our results. Thirdly, for some characteristics data was lacking in many studies. Surprisingly, no association was found between age or dysphagia and pneumonia rate, often described risk factors for pneumonia [24, 31, 32, 35, 43, 44]. Dysphagia was not reported in all studies, which was a limiting factor in the analysis. Lack of these significant associations could be due to few studies reporting adequate information on all these characteristics and therefore the analyses have low explanatory power. Finally, many of the characteristics act on patient level, but studies report aggregate data (i.e., mean age of study population) also reducing explanatory power. Due to these limitations - most importantly the heterogeneity in definition of infections - results of this review need to be interpreted with caution.

            Our review shows the potential of strategies aiming to prevent infections in patients with stroke. Some of these strategies - i.e., prevention of aspiration and reduction of urinary catheterisation - are incorporated in stroke unit care, which reduces the risk of death after stroke through the prevention of infections in particular [45]. Infections can also be prevented by use of preventive antibiotic therapy, as shown in a recent meta-analysis. This meta-analysis did not establish a reduction in mortality, however, included studies were small and heterogeneous and functional outcome was not evaluated [12]. Also, limited data was reported on the effect on antibiotic resistance. Currently, the use of preventive antibiotics in stroke, and the effect of this therapy on antibiotic resistance, is investigated in a large randomized controlled trial with functional endpoint [3]. This trial will be able to establish whether preventive antibiotic treatment is an effective strategy to prevent infection and its adverse effect on outcome in patients in the acute phase of stroke.

            Conclusions

            Results of this meta-analysis show an overall infection rate in the acute phase of stroke of 30%. Rates of pneumonia and urinary tract infection were both 10%. Infection rates are related with study characteristics and the patients' clinical condition, e.g., age, gender, stroke severity, level of consciousness and whether a patient is admitted on ICU. Pneumonia is an independent risk factor for unfavorable outcome and death after stroke. Our data stress the need of interventions to prevent infections in patients with stroke.

            Sources of funding

            This work was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW): 171002302 and the Netherlands Heart Foundation (Hartstichting): 2009B095. DvdB is supported by grants from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; NWOVeni grant 2006 [916.76.023], NWO-Vidi grant 2010 [016.116.358]) and the Academic Medical Center (AMC Fellowship 2008).

            Declarations

            Authors’ Affiliations

            (1)
            Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center
            (2)
            Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center
            (3)
            Center of Infection and Immunity (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center

            References

            1. Vermeij FH, Scholte op Reimer WJ, de Man MP, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Franke CL, de Jong G, de Kort PL, Dippel DW: Stroke-associated infection is an independent risk factor for poor outcome after acute ischemic stroke: data from the Netherlands Stroke Survey. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009, 27:465–471.PubMedView Article
            2. Katzan IL, Cebul RD, Husak SH, Dawson NV, Baker DW: The effect of pneumonia on mortality among patients hospitalized for acute stroke. Neurology 2003, 60:620–625.PubMed
            3. Nederkoorn PJ, Westendorp WF, Hooijenga IJ, de Haan RJ, Dippel DW, Vermeij FH, Dijkgraaf MG, Prins JM, Spanjaard L, van de Beek D: Preventive antibiotics in stroke study: rationale and protocol for a randomised trial. Int J Stroke 2011, 6:159–163.PubMedView Article
            4. Dziedzic T, Pera J, Klimkowicz A, Turaj W, Slowik A, Rog TM, Szczudlik A: Serum albumin level and nosocomial pneumonia in stroke patients. Eur J Neurol 2006, 13:299–301.PubMedView Article
            5. Dziedzic T, Slowik A, Pera J, Szczudlik A: Beta-blockers reduce the risk of early death in ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci 2007, 252:53–56.PubMedView Article
            6. Lees KR, Zivin JA, Ashwood T, Davalos A, Davis SM, Diener HC, Grotta J, Lyden P, Shuaib A, Hardemark HG, Wasiewski WW: NXY-059 for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2006, 354:588–600.PubMedView Article
            7. Schwab S, Schwarz S, Bertram M, Spranger M, Hacke W: [Moderate hypothermia for the treatment of malignant middle cerebral artery infarct]. Nervenarzt 1999, 70:539–546.PubMedView Article
            8. Schwab S, Georgiadis D, Berrouschot J, Schellinger PD, Graffagnino C, Mayer SA: Feasibility and safety of moderate hypothermia after massive hemispheric infarction. Stroke 2001, 32:2033–2035.PubMedView Article
            9. Shuaib A, Lees KR, Lyden P, Grotta J, Davalos A, Davis SM, Diener HC, Ashwood T, Wasiewski WW, Emeribe U: NXY-059 for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:562–571.PubMedView Article
            10. Newell SD, Englert J, Box-Taylor A, Davis KM, Koch KE: Clinical efficiency tools improve stroke management in a rural southern health system. Stroke 1998, 29:1092–1098.PubMedView Article
            11. Webb DJ, Fayad PB, Wilbur C, Thomas A, Brass LM: Effects of a specialized team on stroke care. The first two years of the Yale Stroke Program. Stroke 1995, 26:1353–1357.PubMedView Article
            12. van de Beek D, Wijdicks EF, Vermeij FH, de Haan RJ, Prins JM, Spanjaard L, Dippel DW, Nederkoorn PJ: Preventive antibiotics for infections in acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Neurol 2009, 66:1076–1081.PubMedView Article
            13. Davenport RJ, Dennis MS, Wellwood I, Warlow CP: Complications After Acute Stroke. Stroke 1996, 27:415–420.PubMedView Article
            14. Aslanyan S, Weir CJ, Diener HC, Kaste M, Lees KR: Pneumonia and urinary tract infection after acute ischaemic stroke: a tertiary analysis of the GAIN International trial. Eur J Neurol 2004, 11:49–53.PubMedView Article
            15. Harms H, Prass K, Meisel C, Klehmet J, Rogge W, Drenckhahn C, Gohler J, Bereswill S, Gobel U, Wolf T, Arnold G, Halle E, Volk HD, Dirnagl U, Meisel A: Preventive antibacterial therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2008, 3:e2158.PubMedView Article
            16. Ovbiagele B, Hills NK, Saver JL, Johnston SC: Frequency and determinants of pneumonia and urinary tract infection during stroke hospitalization. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2006, 15:209–213.PubMedView Article
            17. Stott DJ, Falconer A, Miller H, Tilston JC, Langhorne P: Urinary tract infection after stroke. QJM 2009, 102:243–249.PubMedView Article
            18. Hong KS, Kang DW, Koo JS, Yu KH, Han MK, Cho YJ, Park JM, Bae HJ, Lee BC: Impact of neurological and medical complications on 3-month outcomes in acute ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol 2008, 15:1324–1331.PubMedView Article
            19. Pinto AN, Melo TP, Lourenco ME, Leandro MJ, Brazio A, Carvalho L, Franco AS, Ferro JM: Can a clinical classification of stroke predict complications and treatments during hospitalization? Cerebrovasc Dis 1998, 8:204–209.PubMedView Article
            20. Emsley HC, Hopkins SJ: Acute ischaemic stroke and infection: recent and emerging concepts. Lancet Neurol 2008, 7:341–353.PubMedView Article
            21. van der Kooi TI, Mannien J, Wille JC, van Benthem BH: Prevalence of nosocomial infections in The Netherlands, 2007–2008: results of the first four national studies. J Hosp Infect 2010, 75:168–172.PubMedView Article
            22. Georgilis K, Plomaritoglou A, Dafni U, Bassiakos Y, Vemmos K: Aetiology of fever in patients with acute stroke. J Intern Med 1999, 246:203–209.PubMedView Article
            23. Hassan A, Khealani BA, Shafqat S, Aslam M, Salahuddin N, Syed NA, Baig SM, Wasay M: Stroke-associated pneumonia: microbiological data and outcome. Singapore Med J 2006, 47:204–207.PubMed
            24. Hilker R, Poetter C, Findeisen N, Sobesky J, Jacobs A, Neveling M, Heiss WD: Nosocomial pneumonia after acute stroke: implications for neurological intensive care medicine. Stroke 2003, 34:975–981.PubMedView Article
            25. Gosney M, Martin MV, Wright AE: The role of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in acute stroke. Age Ageing 2006, 35:42–47.PubMedView Article
            26. Millns B, Gosney M, Jack CI, Martin MV, Wright AE: Acute stroke predisposes to oral gram-negative bacilli -- a cause of aspiration pneumonia? Gerontology 2003, 49:173–176.PubMedView Article
            27. Jones RN: Microbial etiologies of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2010,51(Suppl 1):S81-S87.PubMedView Article
            28. Bartlett JG: Community-acquired pneumonia. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 2000, 18–22.
            29. Marik PE: Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2001, 344:665–671.PubMedView Article
            30. Marik PE, Careau P: The role of anaerobes in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and aspiration pneumonia: a prospective study. Chest 1999, 115:178–183.PubMedView Article
            31. Hinchey JA, Shephard T, Furie K, Smith D, Wang D, Tonn S: Formal dysphagia screening protocols prevent pneumonia. Stroke 2005, 36:1972–1976.PubMedView Article
            32. Kwon HM, Jeong SW, Lee SH, Yoon BW: The pneumonia score: a simple grading scale for prediction of pneumonia after acute stroke. Am J Infect Control 2006, 34:64–68.PubMedView Article
            33. Adnet F, Baud F: Relation between Glasgow Coma Scale and aspiration pneumonia. Lancet 1996, 348:123–124.PubMedView Article
            34. Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, Diamant N, Speechley M, Teasell R: Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke 2005, 36:2756–2763.PubMedView Article
            35. Walter U, Knoblich R, Steinhagen V, Donat M, Benecke R, Kloth A: Predictors of pneumonia in acute stroke patients admitted to a neurological intensive care unit. J Neurol 2007, 254:1323–1329.PubMedView Article
            36. Chamorro A, Amaro S, Vargas M, Obach V, Cervera A, Torres F, Planas AM: Interleukin 10, monocytes and increased risk of early infection in ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006, 77:1279–1281.PubMedView Article
            37. Haeusler KG, Schmidt WU, Fohring F, Meisel C, Helms T, Jungehulsing GJ, Nolte CH, Schmolke K, Wegner B, Meisel A, Dirnagl U, Villringer A, Volk HD: Cellular immunodepression preceding infectious complications after acute ischemic stroke in humans. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008, 25:50–58.PubMedView Article
            38. Emsley HC, Smith CJ, Hopkins SJ: Infection and brain-induced immunodepression after acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2008, 39:e7.PubMedView Article
            39. Vogelgesang A, Grunwald U, Langner S, Jack R, Broker BM, Kessler C, Dressel A: Analysis of lymphocyte subsets in patients with stroke and their influence on infection after stroke. Stroke 2008, 39:237–241.PubMedView Article
            40. Spratt N, Wang Y, Levi C, Ng K, Evans M, Fisher J: A prospective study of predictors of prolonged hospital stay and disability after stroke. J Clin Neurosci 2003, 10:665–669.PubMedView Article
            41. Iadecola C, Anrather J: The immunology of stroke: from mechanisms to translation. Nat Med 2011, 17:796–808.PubMedView Article
            42. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA: CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008, 36:309–332.PubMedView Article
            43. Kammersgaard LP, Jorgensen HS, Reith J, Nakayama H, Houth JG, Weber UJ: Early infection and prognosis after acute stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2001, 10:217–221.PubMedView Article
            44. Yilmaz GR, Cevik MA, Erdinc FS, Ucler S, Tulek N: The risk factors for infections acquired by cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarct patients in a neurology intensive care unit in Turkey. Jpn J Infect Dis 2007, 60:87–91.PubMed
            45. Govan L, Langhorne P, Weir CJ: Does the prevention of complications explain the survival benefit of organized inpatient (stroke unit) care?: further analysis of a systematic review. Stroke 2007, 38:2536–2540.PubMedView Article
            46. Huang WY, Weng WC, Chien YY, Wu CL, Peng TI, Chen KH: Predictive factors of outcome and stroke recurrence in patients with unilateral atherosclerosis-related internal carotid artery occlusion. Neurol India 2008, 56:173–178.PubMedView Article
            47. Pre-publication history

              1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2377/​11/​110/​prepub

            Copyright

            © Westendorp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

            This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.