Cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive function in middle aged and elderly Lithuanian urban population: results from the HAPIEE study
© Tamosiunas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 19 October 2011
Accepted: 19 November 2012
Published: 30 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Abdonas Tamosiunas|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Szabolcs Szatmari|
|7 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Georgios Tsivgoulis|
|19 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Abdonas Tamosiunas|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Georgios Tsivgoulis|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|19 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|30 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2377-12-149|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.