Signal alterations of the basal ganglia in the differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease: a retrospective case-controlled MRI data bank analysis
© Jesse et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 April 2012
Accepted: 26 December 2012
Published: 29 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Kassubek|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Camicioli|
|24 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dafna Ben Bashat|
|24 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Kassubek|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|24 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Camicioli|
|28 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dafna Ben Bashat|
|6 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Kassubek|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|6 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|29 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2377-12-163|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.