Towards a definition of refractory neuropathic pain for epidemiological research. An international Delphi survey of experts
© Smith et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 14 June 2011
Accepted: 28 May 2012
Published: 28 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Jun 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Howard Smith|
|18 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charles Argoff|
|20 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Serpell|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charles Argoff|
|10 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Serpell|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|10 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|28 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2377-12-29|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.