Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evidence for the different physiological significance of the 6- and 2-minute walk tests in multiple sclerosis

  • Robert W Motl1Email author,
  • Yoojin Suh1,
  • Swathi Balantrapu1,
  • Brian M Sandroff1,
  • Jacob J Sosnoff1,
  • John Pula2,
  • Myla D Goldman3 and
  • Bo Fernhall4
BMC Neurology201212:6

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-6

Received: 6 December 2011

Accepted: 1 March 2012

Published: 1 March 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
6 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francesco Patti
29 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emilio Portaccio
6 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Robert Motl
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Mar 2012 Editorially accepted
1 Mar 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2377-12-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
School of Medicine, University of Illinois at Peoria
Department of Neurology, University of Virginia
College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago