Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical characteristics and patterns of healthcare utilization in patients with painful neuropathic disorders in UK general practice: a retrospective cohort study

  • Ariel Berger1,
  • Alesia Sadosky2,
  • Ellen Dukes2,
  • John Edelsberg1 and
  • Gerry Oster1Email author
BMC Neurology201212:8

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-8

Received: 19 September 2011

Accepted: 6 March 2012

Published: 6 March 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
19 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - andrea truini
14 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ariel Berger
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - andrea truini
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Mar 2012 Editorially accepted
6 Mar 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2377-12-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI),, Four Davis Court Brookline
Pfizer Inc