Fatigue in myasthenia gravis: is it more than muscular weakness?
© Elsais et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 18 December 2012
Accepted: 25 September 2013
Published: 3 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shigeaki Suzuki|
|9 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michal Haran|
|25 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fredric Cantor|
|26 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Ahmed Elsais|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shigeaki Suzuki|
|11 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michal Haran|
|20 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fredric Cantor|
|26 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Ahmed Elsais|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|26 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|3 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2377-13-132|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.