Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Neuropathic pain and use of PainDETECT in patients with fibromyalgia: a cohort study

  • Jarno Gauffin1Email author,
  • Tiina Hankama2,
  • Hannu Kautiainen3, 4,
  • Pekka Hannonen2, 5 and
  • Maija Haanpää6, 7
Contributed equally
BMC Neurology201313:21

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-21

Received: 14 August 2012

Accepted: 8 February 2013

Published: 14 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
14 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nanna Finnerup
21 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marina de Tommaso
3 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jarno Gauffin
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marina de Tommaso
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
14 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2377-13-21

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

ORTON Rehabilitation Centre, ORTON Foundation
Department of Medicine, Central Finland Central Hospital
Unit of Family Practice, Central Finland Central Hospital
Unit of Primary Health Care, Kuopio University Hospital
University of Eastern Finland, School of Medicine
Etera Mutual Pension Insurance Company
Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital