Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

LINGO1 rs9652490 and rs11856808 polymorphisms are not associated with risk for multiple sclerosis

  • Elena García-Martín1Email author,
  • Oswaldo Lorenzo-Betancor2, 3,
  • Carmen Martínez4,
  • Pau Pastor2, 3, 5,
  • Julián Benito-León5, 6, 7,
  • Jorge Millán-Pascual8,
  • Patricia Calleja6,
  • María Díaz-Sánchez6,
  • Diana Pisa9,
  • Laura Turpín-Fenoll8,
  • Hortensia Alonso-Navarro10,
  • Lucía Ayuso-Peralta11,
  • Dolores Torrecillas11,
  • Elena Lorenzo2,
  • José Francisco Plaza-Nieto10,
  • José A G Agúndez4 and
  • Félix Javier Jiménez-Jiménez10, 11
BMC Neurology201313:34

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-34

Received: 2 October 2012

Accepted: 3 April 2013

Published: 10 April 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eriks Jankevics
22 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elvira Valeria De Marco
14 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maja Zivkovic
13 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Elena Garcia-Martin
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elvira Valeria De Marco
23 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maja Zivkovic
1 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Elena Garcia-Martin
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maja Zivkovic
20 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elvira Valeria De Marco
6 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Elena Garcia-Martin
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elvira Valeria De Marco
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
3 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
10 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2377-13-34

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Extremadura
(2)
Neurogenetics Laboratory, Division of Neurosciences, Center for Applied Medical Research, University of Navarra
(3)
Department of Neurology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra School of Medicine
(4)
Department of Pharmacology, University of Extremadura
(5)
CIBERNED, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
(6)
Service of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre
(7)
Department of Medicine, University Complutense
(8)
Section of Neurology, Hospital La Mancha-Centro
(9)
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma
(10)
Section of Neurology, Hospital Universitario del Sureste
(11)
Department of Medicine-Neurology, Hospital “Príncipe de Asturias”, Universidad de Alcalá

Advertisement