Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A systematic review of biomarkers for disease progression in Parkinson’s disease

  • David JM McGhee1Email author,
  • Pamela L Royle2,
  • Paul A Thompson3,
  • David E Wright3,
  • John P Zajicek4 and
  • Carl E Counsell1
BMC Neurology201313:35

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-35

Received: 14 November 2012

Accepted: 2 April 2013

Published: 12 April 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
14 Nov 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gordon Duncan
4 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Potter
26 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - David McGhee
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
12 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2377-13-35

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen
Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick
Centre for Health and Environmental Statistics, Plymouth University
Clinical Neurology Research Group, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth