Risk factors, quality of care and prognosis in South Asian, East Asian and White patients with stroke
© Khan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 25 May 2012
Accepted: 28 June 2013
Published: 5 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - shejun feng|
|14 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Masahiro Kamouchi|
|15 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kazuma Nakagawa|
|13 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Nadia Khan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Masahiro Kamouchi|
|22 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kazuma Nakagawa|
|9 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - shejun feng|
|22 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Nadia Khan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|5 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2377-13-74|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.