Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

One year follow-up of a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a group-based fatigue management programme (FACETS) for people with multiple sclerosis

  • Peter W Thomas1,
  • Sarah Thomas1Email author,
  • Paula Kersten2,
  • Rosemary Jones3,
  • Vicky Slingsby4,
  • Alison Nock4,
  • Angela Davies Smith3,
  • Roger Baker1,
  • Kathleen T Galvin5 and
  • Charles Hillier4
Contributed equally
BMC Neurology201414:109

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-109

Received: 27 February 2014

Accepted: 2 May 2014

Published: 19 May 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Feb 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Heleen Beckerman
12 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maria Donata Benedetti
23 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jaume Sastre-Garriga
22 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Thomas
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Thomas
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 May 2014 Editorially accepted
19 May 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2377-14-109

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Clinical Research Unit, School of Health and Social Care, Bournemouth University
(2)
Person Centred Research Centre, School of Rehabilitation and Occupation Studies, Auckland University of Technology
(3)
MS Research Unit, Bristol and Avon MS Clinical Centre, Frenchay Hospital
(4)
Dorset MS Service, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
(5)
Faculty of Health and Social Care, Hull University

Advertisement