Population-based neuropathological studies of dementia: design, methods and areas of investigation – a systematic review
© Zaccai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 06 September 2005
Accepted: 09 January 2006
Published: 09 January 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Sep 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Sep 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Elbert|
|3 Oct 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Irina Alafuzoff|
|4 Oct 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Walter Kukull|
|10 Nov 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Julia Zaccai|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Nov 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Nov 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Irina Alafuzoff|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Dec 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Julia Zaccai|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|12 Dec 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 Jan 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Julia Zaccai|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|9 Jan 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|9 Jan 2006||Editorially accepted|
|9 Jan 2006||Article published||10.1186/1471-2377-6-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.