Validation of the Cognitive Assessment of Later Life Status (CALLS) instrument: a computerized telephonic measure
© Crooks et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 18 August 2006
Accepted: 21 May 2007
Published: 21 May 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Aug 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Sep 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Celeste de Jager|
|18 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Felicia Huppert|
|28 Nov 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Valerie Crooks|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Nov 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Celeste de Jager|
|9 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angela Gutchess|
|18 May 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Valerie Crooks|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 May 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 May 2007||Editorially accepted|
|21 May 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-2377-7-10|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.