Meta-analysis of duloxetine vs. pregabalin and gabapentin in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain
© Quilici et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 31 March 2008
Accepted: 10 February 2009
Published: 10 February 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|31 Mar 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Apr 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Phil Wiffen|
|6 Aug 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Solomon Tesfaye|
|27 Nov 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Sibilia Quilici|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Nov 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Phil Wiffen|
|18 Dec 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Sibilia Quilici|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|18 Dec 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Jan 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Sibilia Quilici|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|26 Jan 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|10 Feb 2009||Editorially accepted|
|10 Feb 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2377-9-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.