An unusual delusion of duplication in a patient affected by Dementia with Lewy bodies
- Paolo Solla†1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Gioia Mura†2,
- Antonino Cannas1,
- Gianluca Floris1,
- Davide Fonti1,
- Gianni Orofino1,
- Mauro Giovanni Carta†3 and
- Francesco Marrosu†1, 2
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 4 July 2016
Accepted: 17 March 2017
Published: 19 April 2017
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most frequent diagnosis of progressive degenerative dementia in older people. Delusions are common features in DLB and, among them, Capgras syndrome represents the most frequent disturbance, characterized by the recurrent and transient belief that a familiar person, often a close family member or caregiver, has been replaced by an identical-looking imposter. However, other delusional conditions near to misidentification syndromes can occur in DLB patients and may represent a major psychiatric disorder, although rarely studied systematically.
We reported on a female patient affected by DLB who presented with an unusual delusion of duplication. Referring to the female professional caregiver engaged by her relatives for her care, the patient constantly described the presence of two different female persons, with a disorder framed in the context of a delusion of duplication.
A brain 99Tc-hexamethylpropyleneamineoxime SPECT was performed showing moderate hypoperfusion in both occipital lobes, and associated with marked decreased perfusion in parieto-fronto-temporal lobes bilaterally.
An occipital hypoperfusion was identified, although in association with a marked global decrease of perfusion in the remaining lobes. The role of posterior lobes is certainly important in all misidentification syndromes where a natural dissociation between recognition and identification is present. Moreover, the concomitant presence of severe attentional and executive deficits evocative for a frontal syndrome and the marked global decrease of perfusion in the remaining lobes at the SPECT scan also suggest a possible dysfunction in an abnormal connectivity between anterior and posterior areas.
KeywordsDementia with Lewy bodies Delusion of duplication Misidentification syndromes Capgras syndrome
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a progressive degenerative dementia, with core features characterized by fluctuating cognitive symptoms with pronounced variations in attention and alertness, recurrent visual hallucinations and associated features of parkinsonism , which is recognized as the second most common form of severe cognitive impairment in older people .
Delusions are common features in DLB, and patients affected by this condition are firmly hold on their false beliefs also in the presence of strong contradictory evidence. Among delusional disturbances in DLB, Capgras syndrome represents the most frequent disorder affecting approximately 17% of DLB patients and is characterized by the recurrent and transient belief that a familiar person, often a close family member or caregiver, has been replaced by an identical-looking imposter . Capgras syndrome belongs to delusional misidentification syndromes (see Additional file 1: Table S1), among which two major groups were proposed, based on content-specific misidentifications [4, 5]: the Capgras type (also including the Fregoli delusion, a delusional belief that one or more familiar persons, usually persecutors following the patient, are masquerading as several other people) and the Clonal Pluralization type. In the last, patients firmly belief that multiple exact copies of places, objects, self or others exist, such as in the misidentification of reflection, in the reduplicative paramnesia, and in the clonal pluralization of the self [6–8]. However, other delusional conditions near to misidentification syndromes can occur in several patients with DLB and may represent a major psychiatric disorders, although rarely studied systematically. Here we reported on a female patient affected by DLB who presented with an unusual delusion of duplication.
A 77-year-old woman had a history of DLB since 2013 when she was 75. She has a primary school education and was a retired saleswoman. Previous clinical history was unremarkable, she did not assume any medication, and there was no family history of psychiatric or movement disorders. Her initial motor symptoms, started approximately six months before the first examination, were bilateral bradykinesia, followed by rigidity and mild postural instability with associated marked hypomimia and mild hypophonia. Her relatives signaled also a history of likely rapid eye movement sleep behavior (RBD) disorder. Mood and affect were normal, with the exception of mild symptoms of apathy described mainly as a lack of motivation. She was initially treated with levodopa/carbidopa 400/100 mg daily with good initial improvement of parkinsonian symptoms. In agreement with the patient, no medications were introduced to treat RBD symptoms, which were considered not significant by the same patient.
However, three months later, she noticed a moderate increase of her motor symptoms and selegiline 10 mg daily was added. After another month, we were contacted by her relatives because she has started to present a significant cognitive impairment with fluctuating episodes of confusion and visual hallucinations, and, although less marked, with delusional jealousy and persecutory ideas, sometimes with behavioral problems (aggressiveness). Brain MRI was normal and without significant atrophy. Her dementia work-up did not reveal any reversible causes, while results of laboratory tests were normal. Although clinical feature were not suggestive for prion disease or epilepsy, an EEG was done and was normal.
Neuropsychological findings of the subject at evaluation
Adjusted score and/or (Cut-off)
Equivalent score and/or classification
Frontal assessment battery
Trail making test
Digit span forward
2 - Normal
Digit span backward
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test
3 - Normal
Recognition (False recognition)
Test of Corsi
0 - Impaired
2 - Normal
Phonological verbal fluency
4 - Normal
Semantic verbal fluency
0 - Impaired
Modified Card Sorting Test (MCST)
Rey figure (Copy)
0 - Impaired
1 -At lower limit
0 - Impaired-
Simple Figure Copy
0 - Impaired
Thus, delusional jealousy and persecutory ideas were treated with the simultaneous suspension of selegiline and the introduction of quetiapine 12,5 mg/daily. In the following two weeks, both disappearance of these delusions and the normalization of behavioral problems were observed, although a moderate impairment of bradkynesia and rigidity was noted.
However, after four months, her family members reported the appearance of an unusual delusion, characterized by the fact that the patient, referring to the female professional caregiver engaged by her relatives for her care, constantly described the presence of two different female persons, sometimes with different physical characteristics, sometimes similar, with a disorder framed in the context of a delusion of duplication. It was reported, in fact, that the patient always talked about the "two ladies", despite the complaints of family members who indicated the obvious presence of a single person, without substantial criticism of the delusional disorder by the patient. Also in the absence of the professional caregiver, the aberrant conviction of the existence of two different ladies was constantly present, while the caregiver was never recognized as a unique person by the patient. In this respect, during the conversation the patient said: “Today I have arrived to the hospital with my son, without the two ladies who usually take care of me.”, “They are nice people, even if they do not speak much. I do not remember their names, but both speak with a foreign accent”. When we asked if they were both with blond hair, her response was: “I do not remember exactly the color of their hair, but it seems to be of a different color”.
Thus, levodopa was decreased to 200 mg/daily, with no disappearance of the delusion of duplication, but with a clear worsening of parkinsonism. At a follow-up visit, two months later, with the same professional caregiver present during the interview, the patient was referring to her as if it actually were two people. The delusional disorder of duplication was not present in relation to other people or other patient’s relatives. No visual or auditory hallucinations were referred.
Here, we have described a particular delusion of duplication quite different both to the classical Capgras syndrome described in DLB and to the typical clonal pluralization syndromes. In fact, the delusion was not characterized by the patients’s belief that her professional caregiver was been replaced by an identical imposter, but, on the contrary, by the duplication of the same person. Furthermore, in Capgras syndrome, the imposter commonly has features that are very similar to those of the original person, although subtle physical differences are used to differentiate the original person from the imposter. In our case, according the description made by the patient herself, the core of the delusional idea was not characterized by the perception of an imposter, but was simply described as a phenomenon of reduplication. This delusion was not simply an unusual psychotic symptom driven uniquely by medication, because an important reduction of levodopa/carbidopa dosage did not change its clinical presentation, while a total suspension of dopaminergic treatment was impossible for the worsening of parkinsonian symptoms.
Another striking difference with Capgras syndrome is represented by the person involved in the appearance of this delusion of duplication. In fact, while in Capgras syndrome, patients report that one or more well-known persons (usually family members) have been replaced by substitutes , it is interesting to note that this delusion of duplication was referred only to the professional caregiver and not to family members. In this context, it should be considered as the caregiver is at the same time both the nearest and the more extraneous person. On the other hand, the clonal pluralization syndromes are characterized by the false belief of the existence of an identical copy (clone) of the patient’s self or of other individuals; in our case, the patient believed that there was another caregiver in addition to that real, but she did not refer to her as an exact copy, rather than as she was a different individual. This particular form of reduplicative delusion could explain why the patient did not show persecutory ideas neither toward the real caregiver nor the “other” caregiver: simply, she believed to have two caregivers.
This phenomenon of reduplication appears very interesting because its similarity to a type of hallucinatory disorder raises the question on its clear operating framework between these psychiatric conditions. However, the previous presence of other delusional disturbances and the fact that this belief, with a duration longer than two months, was fixed and not amenable to change in light of conflicting evidence, in addition to the absence of any other hallucinatory problem, depose with greater evidence to a classification within the spectrum of delusions, according to the DSM 5 . In any case, it should be remembered as a previous study found a strong relationship between Capgras syndrome and visual hallucinations .
Another issue concerns the possible neurobiological mechanisms that may contribute to the appearance of this delusion of duplication. In fact, several studies have addressed their attention to Capgras syndrome, but other misidentification syndromes have been scarcely studied. With regard to Capgras syndrome, proposed alterations include the presence of impairment in facial processing [10, 11], dysfunction of working memory , altered connectivity among associative areas and limbic/paralimbic structures , bilateral dysfunction of fronto-temporal connectivity [14, 15], and right hemispheric hypo function [16, 17].
In our patient with this peculiar delusion of duplication, an occipital hypoperfusion was identified, although in association with a marked global decrease of perfusion in the remaining lobes. In this context, it should be kept in mind as a deficiency in occipital hypoperfusion is more frequently seen in DLB with respect to other dementia such as Alzheimer disease . The role of posterior lobes is certainly important in all misidentification syndromes where a natural dissociation between recognition and identification is present and is confirmed by the findings of severe deficit of visual-spatial functions observed at the neuropsychological evaluation and typical of a posterior cerebral areas dysfunction. However, the concomitant presence of severe attentional and executive deficits evocative for a frontal syndrome and the marked global decrease of perfusion in the remaining lobes at the SPECT scan also suggest a possible dysfunction in an abnormal connectivity between anterior and posterior areas.
Moreover, the presence of a significant impairment in visual-spatial functions and in visual-spatial memory recall is in agreement with previous neuropsychological findings on delusional misidentifications reporting a low efficiency in the complex visuospatial organization tasks and in non-verbal memory . In this context, there is a clear evidence for impaired visuoperceptual functions in the appearance of misidentificative psychotic symptoms in patients affected by Alzheimer's disease .
In conclusion, we have described an unusual delusion of duplication in a patient affected by LBD. Neural correlates of this peculiar delusion of duplication in LBD still remain largely unclear, and future researches are required to better identify possible neurobiological mechanisms that may contribute to the appearance of this peculiar type of delusion.
Dementia with Lewy bodies
Magnetic resonance imaging
Rapid eye movement sleep behavior
Single-photon emission computed tomography
No funding was obtained for this study.
Availability of data and materials
All the relevant data of this article have been presented in the main paper of the article.
PS contributed to the conception and design of the paper, to the acquisition, to the analysis and interpretation of data, wrote the first draft of the manuscript and was involved in its final drafting. GM contributed to the design of the paper, to the acquisition, to the analysis and interpretation of data, wrote the first draft of the manuscript and was involved in its final drafting. AC revised the manuscript and was involved in its final drafting. GF contributed to the design of the paper, wrote the first draft of the manuscript and was involved in its final drafting. GO revised the manuscript and was involved in its final drafting. DF revised the manuscript and was involved in its final drafting. MGC contributed to design of the paper, revised critically the manuscript and was involved in its final drafting. FM contributed to design of the paper, revised critically the manuscript and was involved in its final drafting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript, and were involved in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Informed consent was obtained by the patient.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Because this is a retrospective case report, ethical approval was waived. However, informed consent was obtained by the patient in order to publish the case in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, Emre M, O'Brien JT, Feldman H, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2005;65(12):1863–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vann Jones SA, O'Brien JT. The prevalence and incidence of dementia with Lewy bodies: a systematic review of population and clinical studies. Psychol Med. 2014;44:673–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thaipisuttikul P, Lobach I, Zweig Y, Gurnani A, Galvin JE. Capgras syndrome in Dementia with Lewy Bodies. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(5):843–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murai T, Toichi M, Yamagishi H, Sengok A. What is meant by ‘misidentification’ in delusional misidentification syndromes. Psychopathology. 1998;31:313–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salvatore P, Bhuvaneswar C, Tohen M, Khalsa HM, Maggini C, Baldessarini RJ. Capgras' syndrome in first-episode psychotic disorders. Psychopathology. 2014;47(4):261–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Politis M, Loane C. Reduplicative paramnesia: a review. Psychopathology. 2012;45:337–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Voros V, Tényi T, Simon M, Trixler M. “Clonal pluralization of the self”: a new form of delusional misidentification syndrome. Psychopathology. 2003;36(1):46–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ranjan S, Chandra PS, Gupta AK, Prabhu S. Clonal pluralization of self, relatives and others. Psychopathology. 2007;40:465–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM–5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013)
- Walther S, Federspiel A, Horn H, Wirth M, Bianchi P, Strik W, Muller TJ. Performance during face processing differentiates schizophrenia patients with delusional misidentifications. Psychopathology. 2010;43:127–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phillips ML, David AS. Facial processing in schizophrenia and delusional misidentification: cognitive neuropsychiatric approaches. Schizophr Res. 1995;17:109–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Papageorgiou C, Lykouras L, Ventouras E, Uzunoglu N, Christodoulou GN. Abnormal P300 in a case of delusional misidentification with coinciding Capgras and Fregoli symptoms. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2002;26:805–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weinstein EA. Classification of delusional misidentification syndromes. Psychopathology. 1994;27:130–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joseph AB, O'Leary DH, Wheeler HG. Bilateral atrophy of the frontal and temporal lobes in schizophrenic patients with Capgras syndrome: a case-control study using computed tomography. J Clin Psychiatry. 1990;51:322–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feinberg TE, Roane DM. Delusional misidentification. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005;28(3):665–83. 678-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cutting J. Delusional misidentification and the role of the right hemisphere in the appreciation of identity. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1991;14:70–5.Google Scholar
- Weinstein EA, Burnham DL. Reduplication and the syndrome of Capgras. Psychiatry. 1991;54(1):78–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lobotesis K, Fenwick JD, Phipps A, Ryman A, Swann A, Ballard C, McKeith IG, O'Brien JT. Occipital hypoperfusion on SPECT in dementia with Lewy bodies but not AD. Neurology. 2001;56(5):643–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paillère-Martinot ML, Dao-Castellana MH, Masure MC, Pillon B, Martinot JL. Delusional misidentification: a clinical, neuropsychological and brain imaging case study. Psychopathology. 1994;27(3-5):200–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reeves SJ, Clark-Papasavas C, Gould RL, Fytche D, Howard RJ. Cognitive phenotype of psychotic symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: evidence for impaired visuoperceptual function in the misidentification subtype. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;30(12):1147–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar