Skip to main content

Table 1 Review of studies that have assessed the effect of CNS penetrating ARTs on NP performance and/or on CSF HIV RNA

From: Central nervous system antiretroviral efficacy in HIV infection: a qualitative and quantitative review and implications for future research

Author & date

What

Samples

HIV

Disease

Design

Findings

Quality scoring > 80% *

< 80% Quality scoring

Main factors

POWER > 80%

Antinori et al., 2002 [25]

CSF

39% detectable viral load at baseline

75 advanced HIV+ individuals

37% naive

29 advanced HIV+ individuals

39% AIDS

Median current CD4: 131

Cross-sectional

Longitudinal

Initiating cART or new cART/retest mean: 11 weeks

Indinavir associated with greater HIV RNA suppression in the CSF

Greater CSF HIV RNA suppression with 3 or more CNS penetrant ARTs

No

Clinical groups heterogeneous with multiple types of CNS HIV-related disorders

IVDU risk factor in 40%

-

Chang et al., 2003 [26]

NP tests

CSF

97% detectable viral load

MRS

33 HIV+ individuals all ART naïve

19 with HAD

Mean current CD4: 182

Longitudinal

3 months follow-up

NP tests

MRS

Better NP performance in individuals on 2 CNS penetrant drugs on 2 NP tests

No correlation between number of CNS penetrant ARTs and reduction in MRS abnormalities.

Yes

-

No

Cysique et al., 2004 [27]

NP tests

97 advanced HIV+ individuals

on long-term CART (average 5 years)

100% AIDS

Mean Nadir CD4: 73

Mean current CD4: 369

Cross sectional

Better performance in Learning and memory when on a CART regimen with = > 3 neuroactive agents in NP impaired (N = 26)

Yes

-

No

Cysique et al, 2006 [28]

NP tests

81 advanced HIV+ individuals

on long-term CART (average 5 years)

100% AIDS

Mean Nadir CD4: 73

Mean current CD4: 385

Longitudinal

Yearly for an average of 27 months

Improvement on Psychomotor speed

on a CART regimen with = > 3 neuroactive agents

No

Inclusion/exclusion criteria not readily available; NeuroHAART definition not readily available

-

Author & date

What

Samples

HIV

Disease

Design

Findings

Quality scoring > 80% *

< 80% Quality scoring

Main factors

POWER > 80%

Cysique et al. 2009 [29]

NP tests

CSF

85% detectable at baseline

37 HIV+ individuals with mild to moderate HAND

Initiated on CART

38% ART naïve

Means Nadir CD4 = 106

Baseline CD4 = 195

AIDS 77%

Longitudinal

Every 12 weeks for 48 weeks

Overall improvement in cognitive functions with higher CPE

Yes

-

No

De Luca et al., 2002 [30]

CSF

Median log 10 CSF HIV RNA: 2.9

95 HIV+ individuals

On cART

50 HIV+ individuals On cART

Median current CD4: 110

Median current CD4: 59

Cross-sectional

Longitudinal

Follow-up median of 7 weeks

Higher number of CNS penetrant ARTs correlated with lower CSF HIV RNA (trend only).

Greater longitudinal decrease in CSF HIV RNA associated higher number of CNS penetrant

No

Clinical groups heterogeneous with multiple types of CNS HIV-related disorders

IVDU risk factor in 30-40%

-

Eggers et al., 2003 [31]

CSF

80% detectable

at baseline

40 HIV+ individuals

10 with HIVE

8 with HAD

Median current CD4: 60

29% CDC stage C

Longitudinal

LP prior and after cART initiation

Unclear time-frame

No correlation between the number of CNS penetrant drugs and slope of CSF viral decay.

No

Definition of HAND using brief screens

Clinical groups heterogeneous

-

Marra et al., 2003 [32]

NP tests

CSF

75% detectable at baseline

25 HIV+ individuals

HAND baseline rate?

Mean current CD4: 259

Longitudinal

Testing before CART initiation at 4 & 8 weeks after

Comparison of regimen containing AZT & IDV to other regimen

Improved on 4 NP tests associated with VL suppression in the CSF in ART naïve (but not 8 weeks)

No significant change in CSF viral load.

No

Small test battery

Unclear inclusion/exclusion criteria

Unclear baseline level of NP-impairment

No adequate normative data

No practice effect correction

-

Author & date

What

Samples

HIV

Disease

Design

Findings

Quality scoring > 80% *

< 80% Quality scoring

Main factors

 

Marra et al., 2009 [33]

NP tests

CSF

Median log 10 CSF HIV RNA at baseline: 3.3

101 HIV+ individuals initiating or changing cART

Median CD4: 111

Longitudinal

Follow-up at 24 and 52 weeks

ACTG 736

Odds of suppression of CSF HIV RNA were higher when CPE rank was = > 2 (N = 79)

Impaired HIV+ individuals on a cART with a CPE = > 2 had worse NP performance over time (N = 26) on NP 4 tests, but not 8 NP tests.

No

Unclear inclusion/exclusion criteria

Short NP testing battery

Lack of education and racial correction in NP tests relevant to the study population

-

Letendre et al., 2004 [34]

CSF

Mean log 10 CSF HIV RNA at baseline: 4.1

31 HIV+ with mild to moderate HAND

81% AIDS

Means nadir Cd4: 30

Current CD4: 111

Longitudinal

Testing before & 15 months after CART initiation

Greater CSF HIV RNA reduction with higher number of CNS penetrant ARTs

No

Unclear study time points

No control for practice effect

Correlational analyses only

No practice effect correction

-

Letendre et al., 2008 [35]

CPE

CSF

17% detectable at baseline

467 HIV+ individuals on cART

389 Undetectable and 78 Detectable

77% AIDS

Medians nadir CD4: 116 current CD4: 406

Cross-sectional

Validation of the CPE index

CPE < 2 associated with an 88%

increase in the odds of detectable CSF viral load

CPE ranks were associated with detectable CSF viral loads with and without treatment and disease adjustments

Yes

-

No

Patel et al., 2009 [36]

Survival time

2398 HIV+ children

77 incident HIVE

[incidence rate 5.1 cases per 1000 person-years.

CD4% ≤ 15%: 19%

Longitudinal

Median 6.4 years

AACT219/219C

High CNS-penetrating regimens associated with a survival benefit (74% reduction in the risk of death, 95% CI 39-89%) after HIVE diagnosis compared with low CNS-penetrating regimens

No

Clinical groups heterogeneity

Clinical diagnoses as outcome

No NP assessment

-

Author & date

What

Samples

HIV

Disease

Design

Findings

Quality scoring > 80% *

< 80% Quality scoring

Main factors

 

Sacktor et al., 2001 [37]

NP tests

18 in single in CSF penetrant group

55 in multiple CSF penetrant group

With psychomotor slowing

6-7% HAD

11%-31% AIDS

Mean current CD4: 339-255

Longitudinal

Six annual study visit

cART initiation

No difference in NP improvement between 2 groups.

No

Unclear inclusion/exclusion criteria

NeuroHAART definition not readily available

Short NP battery

-

Sevigny et al., 2004 [38]

Incident HAD

203 advanced non-demented HIV+ individuals

73% on cART

Median current CD4: 127

Longitudinal

Median follow-up of 21 months

36% with incident HAD

Regimens containing = > CNS penetrant ARTs was not associated with time to HAD

No

Clinical groups heterogeneity

Ad hoc analyses of time to HAD

Time to HAD not a validated measure of NP change

-

Smurzynski et al., 2011 [39]

NP tests

2636 HIV+ individuals at least 6 weeks on cART

Median current CD4: 243

Nadir CD4: 182

Longitudinal

Median follow-up of 4.7 years

CPE rank score & ARTs in cART

Neuroscreen: 3 NP tests

When cART was composed of more than 3 ARTs there was a positive association between CPE and better NP performance in unadjusted and adjusted models.

Yes

 

Yes

Tozzi et al., 2009 [40]

NP tests

Patients with (n = 93) or at risk for (n = 92) HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders

37% stage CDC C

Mean current CD4: 292

Nadir CD4: 181

Cross-sectional

Longitudinal

NP testing before and after cART initiation (20 months mean interval)

Comparison of 2 "neuropenetration" scores (CPE vs. numbers)

Higher CPE correlated with better NP performance at baseline and follow-up, but not using the number of CNS penetrant drugs

Yes

-

Yes

  1. NB: italicized font: beneficial effect of NeuroHAART on NP performance and or CSF HIV RNA reduction
  2. Regular font: neutral effect of the NeuroHAART,
  3. Bold front: negative effect of NeuroHAART.
  4. ARTs: Antiretrovirals
  5. LP: lumbar puncture
  6. HIVE: HIV encephalopathy
  7. MRS: Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
  8. MND: Minor motor Deficits
  9. MSK: Memorial Sloan Kettering
  10. NP: neuropsychological
  11. A score less than or equal to 80% meant that a study presented at least three or more methodological limitations.