Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Perceived wellbeing of patients one year post stroke in general practice - recommendations for quality aftercare

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Dec 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jorunn Drageset
13 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Timothy Kwok
27 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Leonie de Weerd
Resubmission - Version 2
27 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jorunn Drageset
17 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Timothy Kwok
31 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashma Krishan
18 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Leonie de Weerd
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jorunn Drageset
3 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashma Krishan
4 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Leonie de Weerd
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashma Krishan
7 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Leonie de Weerd
Resubmission - Version 5
7 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Leonie de Weerd
Resubmission - Version 6
24 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
31 Mar 2011 Editorially accepted
31 Mar 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2377-11-42

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement