Cerebral aneurysm exclusion by CT angiography based on subarachnoid hemorrhage pattern: a retrospective study
© Kelliny et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 9 August 2010
- Accepted: 21 January 2011
- Published: 21 January 2011
To identify patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage for whom CT angiography alone can exclude ruptured aneurysms.
An observational retrospective review was carried out of all consecutive patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage who underwent both CT angiography and catheter angiography to exclude an aneurysm. CT angiography negative cases (no aneurysm) were classified according to their CT hemorrhage pattern as "aneurismal", "perimesencephalic" or as "no-hemorrhage."
Two hundred and forty-one patients were included. A CT angiography aneurysm detection sensitivity and specificity of 96.4% and 96.0% were observed. All 35 cases of perimesencephalic or no-hemorrhage out of 78 CT angiography negatives also had negative angiography findings.
CT angiography is self-reliant to exclude ruptured aneurysms when either a perimesencephalic hemorrhage or no-hemorrhage pattern is identified on the CT within a week of symptom onset.
- Digital Subtraction Angiography
- Intracranial Aneurysm
- Glasgow Coma Scale Score
- Catheter Angiography
- Average Hospital Stay
Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a sub-type of hemorrhagic stroke with an extremely poor prognosis. Eighty-five percent of non-traumatic SAHs are caused by ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Ten percent fit into the non-aneurismal perimesencephalic hemorrhage (PMH) pattern, whose etiology remains debated. The final five percent are usually due to various rare causes, such as arteriovenous malformations .
When the CT is positive for subarachnoid blood, the combination of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with 3D rotational angiography (3DRA) has been and is still considered the gold standard [2–6]. Meanwhile, CT angiography (CTA) has improved to a sensitivity of about 95% for detecting ruptured aneurysms, when compared to DSA [7–9]. Thus, in many centers, patients with SAH undergo CTA first which is often the basis for an endovascular or neurosurgical approach [10–12]. In any case, DSA remains a relatively riskier procedure than CTA. In patients with coiled intracranial aneurysms, the complication rate of routine angiographic surveillance is 0.43%  and that of general diagnostic angiography in an academic center has a complication rate of 0.3% .
The sensitivity of the head CT for detecting SAH is usually around 95% the first day after SAH, then gradually drops to around 58% on the fifth day [2, 15–18]. The sensitivity of the head CT diminishes with less significant hemorrhage. This decreased sensitivity with time is assumed to be due to the resorption of blood during the renewal of cerebrospinal fluid several times a day.
Non-aneurismal perimesencephalic hemorrhage
Non-aneurismal PMH has a good clinical outcome besides a low risk of re-bleeding and vasospasm. It comprises 96% of all PMHs [2, 19–24]. The remaining 4% are due to vertebrobasilar aneurysms [23, 25–27]. Non-aneurismal PMH is defined by a normal four-vessel high quality digital subtraction angiogram [19, 28, 29] combined with the following distribution of blood in the subarachnoid space:
1. The center of the hemorrhage is immediately anterior to the midbrain or the pons [19, 29–31]. Variants of PMH occur in the basal cisterns around the midbrain: interpeduncular, crural, ambient, quadrigeminal, [19, 29, 32, 33] prepontine and carotid cisterns .
2. Bleeding may extend up to the posterior part of the interhemispheric fissure and the basal part of the Sylvian fissure.
Although non-aneurismal PMH and aneurismal hemorrhages may look alike on the CT, the clinical presentation of the first is milder with patients fully conscious or slightly disoriented. The rupture of a vein in the prepontine or interpeduncular cisterns seems to be the bleeding source of non-aneurismal PMH .
In patients with a benign clinical presentation and a PMH, the probability of finding a ruptured aneurysm varies between 2.5 and 8.9% [19, 23, 27, 36, 37]. Given this probability versus the clinical risks of DSA, adding DSA to a high quality CTA to exclude a ruptured aneurysm is increasingly debated .
Purpose of the study
This study aims to identify when a ruptured aneurysm can be excluded by CTA, thereby avoiding catheter angiography.
This is an observational retrospective study of all consecutive 241 adult patients who underwent both technically adequate catheter angiography and CTA for a suspicion of a ruptured aneurysm at a tertiary referral center, from January 1st 1998 to December 31st 2007. SAH was diagnosed by non-contrast CT or lumbar puncture. Arteriovenous malformations, tumors, cavernomas, infections, and trauma were excluded. Based on the final diagnosis established by conventional angiography or peroperatively, 166 patients had a bleeding aneurysm. The study, having been conducted according to the Institutional Ethical Committee's recommendations, was therefore deemed exempt of requiring its explicit approval.
Specifications of CT scanners from 1998 to 2007
CT scanner specifications
Number of cases per scanner
1998 - November 1999
GE Highspeed Advantage CT/i 1 detector row
December 1999 - April 2002
GE Lightspeed QX/i 4 detector rows
May 2002 - November 2002
GE Lightspeed ultra 8 detector rows
December 2002 - November 2005
GE Lightspeed 16 advantage 16 detector rows
December 2005 - December 2007
GE VCT 64 detector rows
Typical acquisition parameters of the CT scanners
Rotation speed (s)
Detector collimation (mm)
Reconstruction interval (mm)
Every patient underwent four-vessel DSA via a transfemoral intra-arterial approach with multiple projections. 3DRA was done whenever deemed necessary, mainly to improve aneurysm preoperative planning .
The review of the CTA and the initial reading were performed on a workstation (Advantage Windows, General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) to allow interactive reconstruction and interpretation, which has proved to be more accurate than an isolated review of hard-copy images . Axial raw images, multiplanar 2D reconstructions, maximum intensity projection reconstructions, and shaded surface display reconstructions with volume rendering technique were used for CTA review. Then, two experienced neuroradiologists blinded to the CT report and the DSA findings, independently examined the CTA of the false negative and positive cases.
Subsequently, the bleeding patterns of all CTA negative patients (true and false negatives) were classified as: perimesencephalic, aneurismal, or no visible SAH (xanthochromic lumbar puncture). This classification was based on the admission CT and the PMH definition from this article's introduction. The time between symptom onset and CT was calculated for the categories of PMH and no visible SAH.
Results of CT angiography (CTA) vs. conventional angiography regarding the presence of an aneurysm
No Aneurysm -
Aneurysm + (%)
No Aneurysm -(%)
Negative CT angiography (CTA) cases
Initial CT Hemorrhage Pattern of Negative CTA Cases
Aneurysm Found on Catheter Angiography (CTA False Negatives)
No Aneurysm Found on Catheter Angiography (CTA True Negatives)
Negative Predictive Value
Clinical presentations of the negative CTA cases
All of the patients with a perimesencephalic hemorrhage pattern presented in excellent clinical grade with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 and thus with a World Federation of Neurosurgeons (WFNS) classification score of 1. Their average hospital stay was 5 ± 3 days. Out of the 16 cases with a no-hemorrhage pattern, 13 had a GCS score of 15 and a WFNS score of 1, two had GCS scores of 13-14 and WFNS scores of 3-2 respectively. This data was unavailable for the last. The average hospital stay of patients with a no-hemorrhage pattern was 4 ± 3 days. Forty-one of the 43 patients with an aneurismal pattern had GCS scores of 12-15 and WFNS scores of 1-4. One patient had a GCS score of 3 and a WFNS score of 5. This data was unavailable for the last. The average hospital stay of patients with an aneurismal pattern was 14 ± 6 days.
There were 6 cases in which an aneurysm was missed in their original CTA readings, but each one had an aneurismal hemorrhage pattern. All 35 patients with either a PMH or no-hemorrhage pattern on the initial CT had negative findings on DSA, confirming the negative CTAs. Therefore, this sample showed a 100% negative predictive value of CTA. Thirty-three (94%) of these 35 patients had follow-up imaging. Thirty-one underwent repeat delayed DSA and two Magnetic Resonance Angiography. The last two patient's detailed neurological exams were asymptomatic at four months for one and six for the other, after the SAH.
When the blinded neuroradiologists reread the original CTAs of the false positive and false negative cases at a later date, each identified 4/6 previously missed aneurysms. The first neuroradiologist corrected all false positive cases and the second 2/3. Before review, the sensitivity and specificity were 96.4% and 96.0% respectively. Both reviewers demonstrated a 98.8% sensitivity. The first had a 100% specificity and the second 98.7%.
In this study, for the PMH patterns, the time from symptom onset to CT/CTA was between 1.3 hours and 7 days (median 19.5 hours, 3/19 cases over 48 hours) and between 2 hours and 12 days (median 25.5 hours, 7/16 cases over 48 hours) when no hemorrhage was seen.
False negatives and false positives
The false positives had either no hemorrhage visible on the initial CT (2/3) or an aneurismal hemorrhage pattern.
Thirty-one percent of the patients in this study sample did not have a ruptured aneurysm (19% had an aneurismal pattern, 8% had a PMH pattern, and 7% had no-hemorrhage). This distribution into different SAH categories is comparable to that of Little et al 2007. That sample consisted of 23% without a ruptured aneurysm on the initial catheter angiography (16% had an aneurismal pattern, 4% had a PMH pattern, and 3% had no-hemorrhage) .
The present study's sensitivity and specificity are similar to others. A blinded review of false negative and positive cases corrected at least two thirds of them, thus showing its importance. A second reading proved useful in cases with an aneurismal hemorrhage pattern since errors happened only then.
The negative predictive value of CTA varied depending on whether the non-contrast CT showed an aneurismal hemorrhage pattern, a PMH pattern or a no-hemorrhage pattern. When the non-contrast CT displayed a PMH or no-hemorrhage pattern, the CTA negative predictive value and sensitivity were both 100% with respect to 3DRA. This implied that in these cases, CTA was as good as 3DRA to exclude an aneurysm. Hence, CTA could have been used as the sole diagnostic imaging technique with its lower risks and costs and with greater facility of access (while the patient was still in the CT scanner).
First of all, Agid et al  retrospectively evaluated 193 CTAs with negative findings performed for SAH. Of these patients, 68 had a diffuse aneurismal or peripheral sulcal pattern, 93 had PMH and 32 had no blood on CT. All patients with PMH and with no blood on CT did not have an aneurysm detected by DSA. They concluded that in patients with SAH, negative CTA findings are reliable in ruling out aneurysms in the PMH pattern or no blood on CT. DSA is indicated in the diffuse aneurismal pattern of SAH, and repeat delayed DSA is required if the initial DSA findings are negative.
Secondly, Kershenovich et al  deduced from a retrospective study of 30 patients with negative CTAs, DSAs and PMH that brain CTA alone is a good and conclusive diagnostic tool to rule out aneurysms in patients presenting with the classic PMH pattern and could thus replace DSA. They also mention 8 patients diagnosed with SAH only by LP, where an initially negative CTA scan would have been sufficient to rule out an aneurysm.
Thirdly, in a series of 60 patients with SAH and negative CTA results, Westerlaan et al  reported 17 with a nonperimesencephalic (aneurismal) blood distribution, 30 with PMH, and 13 without blood on CT. DSA was performed in 74% of the patients with PMH and without blood on the initial CT. All were true negatives. In the aneurismal blood distribution group, an aneurysm was found in 5 (29%) patients, including 1 aneurysm seen only on DSA.
Ruigrok et al's  sensitivity analysis to evaluate the effect of different strategies following a PMH pattern shows that CTA only is the best diagnostic strategy. A fifth study reported a sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of 100% for 15 patients with a PMH pattern . It concluded that CTA was an adequate screening examination for vertebrobasilar aneurysms.
Pooling the results of these five studies with ours adds up to 187 patients with PMH and 69 patients with no-hemorrhage on CT in five different countries. These demonstrate with greater confidence the reliability of CTA as the sole imaging diagnostic tool in the context of a PMH or no blood on CT.
Furthermore, this study verifies the dependability of CTA in patients with PMH or no blood on CT, even in the face of the latest gold standard, 3DRA and follow-up imaging (94% of our cases). Besides, it adds more patients in a real life clinical setting, for a condition with a low incidence.
The variability in time between symptom onset and CT (1.3 hours to 12 days) may have changed the category of certain cases from an aneurismal hemorrhage pattern to no visible hemorrhage, due to blood resorption with time. This did not affect the present study's results. Though, applying its conclusions in other settings, an aneurysm could be missed in patients with originally an aneurismal hemorrhage pattern who do not undergo catheter angiography. Therefore, repetition of this research in several institutions is required to explore this point.
Successive generations of CT with an increased number of detectors have provided clearer images for improved diagnostic comfort according to professional experience. Otherwise, no objective improvement in accuracy was observed with the evolution of scanners, as false negatives were scattered throughout the years and models. All the false positives and more false negatives were found when the 16-slice scanner was used, for a standardized number of cases. The most likely explanation appears to be the difference in pitch (table 2) or the contribution of chance as the number of misses is small and 38.7% of all cases were done on this machine.
This study shows that CT angiography is sufficient to exclude ruptured aneurysms without catheter angiography for patients with a PMH pattern or without any hemorrhage on the CT, when done within a week of symptom onset. For all other SAH cases, if the CT angiogram is negative, catheter angiography is still required.
- van Gijn J, Kerr RS, Rinkel GJ: Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2007, 369: 306-318. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60153-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van der Wee N, Rinkel GJ, Hasan D, van Gijn J: Detection of subarachnoid haemorrhage on early CT: Is lumbar puncture still needed after a negative scan?. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995, 58: 357-359. 10.1136/jnnp.58.3.357.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- van Rooij WJ, Peluso JP, Sluzewski M, Beute GN: Additional value of 3D rotational angiography in angiographically negative aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage: how negative is negative?. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008, 29: 962-966. 10.3174/ajnr.A0972.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Rooij WJ, Sprengers ME, de Gast AN, Peluso JP, Sluzewski M: 3D rotational angiography: the new gold standard in the detection of additional intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008, 29: 976-979. 10.3174/ajnr.A0964.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirai T, Korogi Y, Suginohara K, Ono K, Nishi T, Uemura S, Yamura M, Yamashita Y: Clinical usefulness of unsubtracted 3D digital angiography compared with rotational digital angiography in the pretreatment evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003, 24: 1067-1074.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hochmuth A, Spetzger U, Schumacher M: Comparison of three-dimensional rotational angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002, 23: 1199-1205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chappell ET, Moure FC, Good MC: Comparison of computed tomographic angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2003, 52: 624-631. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000047895.82857.EB.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wintermark M, Uske A, Chalaron M, Regli L, Maeder P, Meuli R, Schnyder P, Binaghi S: Multislice computerized tomography angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. J Neurosurg. 2003, 98: 828-836. 10.3171/jns.2003.98.4.0828.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Villablanca JP, Hooshi P, Martin N, Jahan R, Duckwiler G, Lim S, Frazee J, Gobin YP, Sayre J, Bentson J, Viñuela F: Three-dimensional helical computerized tomography angiography in the diagnosis, characterization and management of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: comparison with conventional angiography and intraoperative findings. J Neurosurg. 2002, 97: 1322-1332. 10.3171/jns.2002.97.6.1322.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Westerlaan HE, Gravendeel J, Fiore D, Metzemaekers JD, Groen RJ, Mooij JJ, Oudkerk M: Multislice CT angiography in the selection of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms suitable for clipping or coiling. Neuroradiology. 2007, 49: 997-1007. 10.1007/s00234-007-0293-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lubicz B, Levivier M, François O, François O, Thoma P, Sadeghi N, Collignon L, Balériaux D: Sixty-four-row multisection CT angiography for detection and evaluation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: interobserver and intertechnique reproducibility. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007, 28: 1949-1955. 10.3174/ajnr.A0699.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agid R, Lee SK, Willinsky RA, Farb RI, terBrugge KG: Acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: using 64-slice multidetector CT angiography to "triage" patients' treatment. Neuroradiology. 2006, 48: 787-794. 10.1007/s00234-006-0129-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ringer AJ, Rodriguez-Mercado R, Veznedaroglu E, Levy EI, Hanel RA, Mericle RA, Lopes DK, Lanzino G, Boulos AS: Defining the risk of retreatment for aneurysm recurrence or residual after initial treatment by endovascular coiling: a multicenter study. Neurosurgery. 2009, 65: 311-315. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000349922.05350.96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fifi JT, Meyers PM, Lavine SD, Cox V, Silverberg L, Mangla S, Pile-Spellman J: Complications of modern diagnostic cerebral angiography in an academic medical center. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009, 20: 442-447. 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.01.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kassell NF, Torner JC, Haley EC, Jane JA, Adams HP, Kongable GL: The International Cooperative Study on the timing of aneurysm surgery, I: Overall management results. J Neurosurg. 1990, 73: 18-10.3171/jns.1990.73.1.0018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sames TA, Storrow AB, Finkelstein JA, Magoon MR: Sensitivity of new-generation computed tomography in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acad Emerg Med. 1996, 3: 16-10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03296.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sidman R, Connolly E, Lemke T: Subarachnoid hemorrhage diagnosis: lumbar puncture is still needed when the computed tomography scan is normal. Acad Emerg Med. 1996, 3: 827-10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03526.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boesiger BM, Shiber JR: Subarachnoid hemorrhage diagnosis by computed tomography and lumbar puncture: are fifth generation CT scanners better at identifying subarachnoid hemorrhage?. J Emerg Med. 2005, 29: 23-27. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.02.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rinkel GJ, Wijdicks EF, Vermeulen M, Ramos LM, Tanghe HL, Hasan D, Meiners LC, van Gijn J: Nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage: CT and MR patterns that differ from aneurysm rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991, 12: 829-834.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rinkel GJ, Wijdicks EF, Vermeulen M, Hasan D, Brouwers PJ, van Gijn J: The clinical course of perimesencephalic nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Ann Neurol. 1991, 29: 463-468. 10.1002/ana.410290503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rinkel GJ, Wijdicks EF, Hasan D, Kienstra GE, Franke CL, Hageman LM, Vermeulen M, van Gijn J: Outcome in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage and negative angiography according to pattern of haemorrhage on computed tomography. Lancet. 1991, 338: 964-968. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91836-J.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brilstra EH, Hop JW, Rinkel GJ: Quality of life after perimesencephalic haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997, 63: 382-384. 10.1136/jnnp.63.3.382.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Velthuis BK, Rinkel GJ, Ramos LM, Witkamp TD, van Leeuwen MS: Perimesencephalic hemorrhage. Exclusion of vertebrobasilar aneurysms with CT angiography. Stroke. 1999, 30: 1780-1786.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ildan F, Tuna M, Erman T, Gocer AI, Cetinalp E: Prognosis and prognostic factors in nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic hemorrhage: A follow-up study in 29 patients. Surg Neurol. 2002, 57: 160-166. 10.1016/S0090-3019(02)00630-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goergen SK, Barrie D, Sacharias N, Waugh JR: Perimesencephalic subarachnoid haemorrhage: negative angiography and favourable prognosis. Australas Radiol. 1993, 37: 156-160. 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1993.tb00040.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kitahara T, Ohwada T, Tokiwa K, Kurata A, Miyasaka Y, Yada K, Kan S: Clinical study in patients with perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage of unknown etiology. No Shinkei Geka. 1993, 21: 903-908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pinto AN, Ferro JM, Canhao P, Campos J: How often is a perimesencephalic subarachnoid haemorrhage CT pattern caused by ruptured aneurysms?. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1993, 124: 79-81. 10.1007/BF01401126.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ausman JI: Perimesencephalic nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: what is it? what are we missing?. Surg Neurol. 2002, 57: 211-10.1016/S0090-3019(02)00634-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz TH, Solomon RA: Perimesencephalic nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1996, 39: 433-440. 10.1097/00006123-199609000-00001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zentner J, Solymosi L, Lorenz M: Subarachnoid hemorrhage of unknown etiology. Neurol Res. 1996, 18: 220-226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schievink WI, Wijdicks EF: Pretruncal subarachnoid hemorrhage: an anatomically correct description of the perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1997, 28: 2572-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Gijn J, van Dongen KJ, Vermeulen M, Hijdra A: Perimesencephalic hemorrhage: a nonaneurysmal and benign form of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 1985, 35: 493-497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz TH, Farkas J: Quadrigeminal non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a true variant of perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage: case report. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2003, 105: 95-98. 10.1016/S0303-8467(02)00112-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz TH, Mayer SA: Quadrigeminal variant of perimesencephalic nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2000, 46: 584-588. 10.1097/00006123-200003000-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van der Schaaf I, Velthuis BK, Gouw A, Rinkel GJ: Venous drainage in perimesencephalic hemorrhage. Stroke. 2004, 35: 1614-1618. 10.1161/01.STR.0000131657.08655.ce.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Calenbergh F, Plets C, Goffin J, Velghe L: Nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: prevalence of perimesencephalic hemorrhage in a consecutive series. Surg Neurol. 1993, 39: 320-323. 10.1016/0090-3019(93)90014-R.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alén JF, Lagares A, Lobato RD, Gómez PA, Rivas JJ, Ramos A: Comparison between perimesencephalic nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by posterior circulation aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2003, 98: 529-535.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruigrok YM, Rinkel GJ, Buskens E, Velthuis BK, van Gijn J: Perimesencephalic hemorrhage and CT angiography: a decision analysis. Stroke. 2000, 31: 2976-2983.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Young N, Dorsch NW, Kingston RJ, Soo MY, Robinson A: Spiral CT scanning in the detection and evaluation of aneurysms of the Circle of Willis. Surg Neurol. 1998, 50: 50-61. 10.1016/S0090-3019(98)00015-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Little AS, Garrett M, Germain R, Farhataziz N, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG, Zabramski JM, Nakaji P, Spetzler RF: Evaluation of patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage and negative angiography. Neurosurgery. 2007, 61: 1139-1150. 10.1227/01.neu.0000306091.30517.e7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agid R, Andersson T, Almqvist H, Willinsky RA, Lee SK, terBrugge KG, Farb RI, Söderman M: Negative CT angiography findings in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: when is digital subtraction angiography still needed?. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010, 31: 696-705. 10.3174/ajnr.A1884.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kershenovich A, Rappaport ZH, Maimon S: Brain computed tomography angiographic scans as the sole diagnostic examination for excluding aneurysms in patients with perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2006, 59: 798-802. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000232724.19888.C6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/11/8/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.