Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy from autopsy studies, according to imaging finding and method

From: Is MRI better than CT for detecting a vascular component to dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Imaging finding

Number of studies

Sample size

Sensitivity (95% CI)

tau2 for sensitivity

Specificity (95% CI)

tau2 for specificity

Positive likelihood ratio (95% CI)

Negative likelihood ratio (95% CI)

DOR (95% CI)

CT

 White matter hyperintensities

2

84

73 (58, 84)

0

63 (46, 77)

0

1.96 (1.23, 3.12)

0.43 (0.25, 0.75)

4.5 (1.70, 12)

 Global assessment

1

32

18 (6, 41)

80 (55, 93)

0.88 (0.21, 3.73)

1.03 (0.74, 1.44)

0.9 (0.20, 4.50)

 Periventricular hyperintensities

3

31

85 (43, 98)

1.95

50 (11, 89)

2.12

1.70 (0.58, 5.05)

0.30 (0.04, 2.18)

5.6 (0.32, 100)

 Lacunar infarcts

1

96

12 (4, 29)

100 (57, 100)

1.40 (0.08, 23.74)

0.96 (0.73, 1.27)

∞ (0.14, ∞)

 Non-lacunar infarcts

2

79

70 (56, 81)

0

93 (80, 99)

0

12.75 (3.28, 49.60)

0.31 (0.20,0.48)

41 (8.20, 196)

 General infarcts

2

123

41 (5, 89)

2.8

78 (32, 96)

1.7

1.82 (0.22,15.20)

0.76 (0.25,2.30)

2.4 (0.10, 57)

MRI

 White matter hyperintensities

1

43

79 (52, 92)

28 (15, 46)

1.09 (0.76, 1.55)

0.78 (0.24, 2.49)

1.4 (0.33, 5.80)