Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Impact of the implementation of the AAN epilepsy quality measures on the medical records in a university hospital

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Jan 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - PEI LIN LUA
4 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Ferro
11 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Romy Mahrer Imhof
15 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jose Miguel Cisneros-Franco
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jose Miguel Cisneros-Franco
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Ferro
3 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Romy Mahrer Imhof
6 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - PEI LIN LUA
8 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jose Miguel Cisneros-Franco
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
30 Jul 2013 Editorially accepted
28 Aug 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2377-13-112

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement