Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Eleven years of experience with the neurologic complications in Korean patients with acute aortic dissection: a retrospective study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ferdinand Serracino-Inglott
9 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Rodriguez-Luna
13 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - roberto di bartolomeo
28 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Seung-Jae Lee
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - roberto di bartolomeo
12 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Rodriguez-Luna
8 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Seung-Jae Lee
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Seung-Jae Lee
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
6 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Seung-Jae Lee
Resubmission - Version 7
6 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
16 May 2013 Editorially accepted
21 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2377-13-46

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement