This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
One year follow-up of a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a group-based fatigue management programme (FACETS) for people with multiple sclerosis
- Peter W Thomas†1,
- Sarah Thomas†1Email author,
- Paula Kersten2,
- Rosemary Jones3,
- Vicky Slingsby4,
- Alison Nock4,
- Angela Davies Smith3,
- Roger Baker1,
- Kathleen T Galvin5 and
- Charles Hillier4
© Thomas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 27 February 2014
Accepted: 2 May 2014
Published: 19 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Feb 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Heleen Beckerman|
|12 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maria Donata Benedetti|
|23 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jaume Sastre-Garriga|
|22 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Thomas|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Thomas|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|19 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2377-14-109|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.