Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Optimal treatment determination on the basis of haematoma volume and intra-cerebral haemorrhage score in patients with hypertensive putaminal haemorrhages: a retrospective analysis of 310 patients

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Oct 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheryl Martin-Schild
28 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shaheryar Hafeez
29 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sebastian Koch
13 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Chao You
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sebastian Koch
10 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheryl Martin-Schild
17 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shaheryar Hafeez
22 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Chao You
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheryl Martin-Schild
16 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sebastian Koch
26 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Chao You
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Chao You
Resubmission - Version 5
31 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
30 Jun 2014 Editorially accepted
4 Jul 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2377-14-141

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement