Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Neurology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prognosis and therapy of tumor-related versus non-tumor-related status epilepticus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Yunus Arik1,
  • Frans SS Leijten2,
  • Tatjana Seute2,
  • Pierre A Robe3 and
  • Tom J Snijders2Email author
BMC Neurology201414:152

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-152

Received: 8 April 2014

Accepted: 9 July 2014

Published: 19 July 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Apr 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
6 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christoph Kellinghaus
15 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marco Riva
30 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Tom Snijders
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
9 Jul 2014 Editorially accepted
19 Jul 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2377-14-152

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
(2)
Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
(3)
Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Advertisement