Skip to content


  • Study protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effects of intravenous infusion of hydrogen-rich fluid combined with intra-cisternal infusion of magnesium sulfate in severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

  • Satoru Takeuchi1Email author,
  • Kentaro Mori1,
  • Hirohiko Arimoto2, 3,
  • Kazuya Fujii1,
  • Kimihiro Nagatani1,
  • Satoshi Tomura1,
  • Naoki Otani1,
  • Hideo Osada1 and
  • Kojiro Wada1
BMC Neurology201414:176

Received: 29 July 2014

Accepted: 2 September 2014

Published: 9 September 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
29 Jul 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Satoru Takeuchi
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Sep 2014 Editorially accepted
9 Sep 2014 Article published 10.1186/s12883-014-0176-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neurosurgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan
Department of Neurosurgery, Japan Defense Forces Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Neurosurgery, Mishuku Hospital, Tokyo, Japan