Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview of the measurement level, target population, upper extremity outcome measures included in the reviews and recommended or meeting the criteria of psychometrics as reported in the primary reviews

From: An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke

Author year

ICF level (special interest)

Target population

OM for UE and stroke (number)

List of included OM for UE

Recommended or met the criteria of psychometrics

Number

OM

Standard or criteria used

Ashford 2008 [22]

Activity (real-life functioning)

stroke, brain injury

6

MAL (12,14, 26, 28 items), ABILHAND, Leeds Adult Spasticity Impact Scale

1

ABILHAND

Met 9 of 11 criteria

Baker 2011 [21]

Body function and activity (robot-assisted trials)

stroke

25

ARAT, CAHAI, 10s test, AMAT, WMFT, FMA, MSS, MAS, DeSouza, RMA, STREAM, MESUPE, MI, NHPT, FAT, Sodring Motor Evaluation Test, Sollerman, MCA, MMAC, BBT, Functional Test; Patient-reported: DHI, MAL, ABILHAND, UMAQS

3 Additional scales (2)

CAHAI, STREAM, ABILHAND Additional (FMA, ARAT)

MOT and FDA standards; psychometrics provided for CAHAI, STREAM, ABILHAND

Connell 2012 [31]

Body function and activity (clinical utility)

neurologic conditions

11

BBT, NHPT, ARAT, ABILHAND, MAL (14,26), RMA, MSS, Sollerman, Simplified STREAM, Fitts Reaching test

2

BBT, ARAT

Clinical utility criteria of ≥8; criteria of validity, intra/inter-rater reliability, ability to detect change

Croarkin 2004 [32]

Body function and functional limitation (no disability scales)

stroke

9

ARAT, CMSA, FMA, MMAC, MAS, MCA, MI, NHPT, RMA

6

NHPT, FMA, MI, CMSA, ARAT, MAS

Met 2 of 3 criteria: validity, inter-rater, test-retest reliability; psychometrics provided

Gebruers 2010 [30]*

Activity (accelerometry)

stroke

NA

Accelerometry

NA

NA

No specific criteria; psychometrics provided

Hillier 2010 [23]

ICF (clinical use)

stroke

7

Manual muscle testing, Tardieu Scale, WMFT, Grip strength, CAHAI, Hand Active Sensation Test, NHPT

2

CAHAI

Standards described for reliability, validity, responsiveness, utility; psychometrics not provided

Lemmens 2012 [33]*

Activity

stroke, CP

17

AMAT, CAHAI, FAT, TEMPA, ARAT, JHFT, MESUPE, WMFT, ABILHAND, MAL, DHI, UBDS, Actual amount of use, Functional test, MFT, Hand Function Survey, Accelerometry

9

AMAT, CAHAI, FAT, UBDS, ARAT, JHFT, WMFT, DHI, MAL-26

No specific criteria; reference provided for validity, reliability, responsiveness; psychometrics not provided

Platz 2005 [34]*

Body function (spasticity)

stroke, MS, SCI and CP with spasticity

11

Ashworth Scale (original, modified, velocity corrected), Muscle Tone Scale, Modified Tardieu Scale, VAS for tone, Tone assessment Scale, ROM (goniometer, estimation), Finger curl test, Tendon reflex scale

0

-

No specific criteria; psychometrics not provided

Simpson 2013 [35]*

Activity (responsiveness)

stroke

14

ABILHAND, AMAT, ARAT, Accelerometry, CAHAI, DHI, FAT, Functional Test, Hand Function Survey, JHFT, MAL, SIS, TEMPA, WMFT

5

ABILHAND, ARAT, MAL, SIS, WMFT

No specific criteria; MCID values provided

Sivan 2011 [14]

ICF (robot-assisted trials)

Stroke

17

FMA, MSS, CMSA, Ashworth Scale, MRC, Kinematics, Grip strength, NHPT, BBT, ARAT, WMFT, CAHAI, AMAT, RMA (arm), FAT, MAS, ABILHAND

5

FMA, Kinematics, ARAT, WMFT, ABILHAND

Criteria high/excellent/moderate for validity, reliability, responsiveness provided

Tse 2013 [36]

Participation

stroke

1

SIS

0

-

Criteria for reliability, internal consistency, validity

van Peppen 2007 [37]

ICF (clinical utility for physiotherapy practice)

stroke

10

Core set: MI, FAT; Optional: ROM, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Nottingham Sensory Assessment, Modified Ashworth Scale, FMA, Hand volumeter, ARAT, NHPT

2

MI, FAT (core set)

Level of evidence at least 2 (psychometric properties, clinical utility, ICF)

Velstra 2011 [38]*

ICF (reliability, responsiveness)

stroke, tetraplegia, peripheral or reumathology conditions

8

Ashworth Scale, ARAT, MAL, WMFT, JHFT, FMA, Muscle strength, ROM

2

ARAT, MAL

No specific criteria; grading very good/good for reliability, internal consistency and responsiveness provided; psychometrics not provided

  1. *Reviews did not provide standards, criteria or sufficient information on psychometrics needed for qualification; OM printed in italic were included into the final set (n = 13); Abbreviations: ICF International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, OM outcome measures, UE upper extremity, MS Multiple sclerosis, SCI spinal cord injury, CP cerebral palsy, CAHAI Chedoke Arm Hand Activity Inventory, STREAM Stroke Rehabilitation, Assessment Movement, BBT Box and Block Test, ARAT Action Research Arm Test, NHPT Nine Hole Peg Test, FMA Fugl-Meyer Assessment (motor), MI Motoricity Index, CMSA Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment, MAS Motor Assessment Scale, MAL Motor Activity Log, SIS Stroke Impact Scale, WMFT Wolf Motor Function Test, FAT Frenchay Arm Test (abbreviations for all OM are provided in the end section of the paper).