Skip to main content

Table 2 Assessment of the methodological quality of the randomized controlled trials

From: Intravenous immunoglobulin for postpolio syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study [year]

Country

Allocation generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding

Data analysis

Loss to follow-up

Selective reporting

Other bias

Bertolasi [2013] [14]

Italy

Unclear

Unclear

Blinded patients and assessors

ITT

0

Low risk

Low risk

Farbu [2007] [12]

Norway

Notes drawn

Adequate

Blinded patients and assessors

ITT

0

Low risk

Intergroup differences in baseline assessments of muscle strength

Gonzalez [2006] [10]

Sweden

Computer generated

Adequate

Blinded caregivers, patients, and assessors

PP

4.9%

Low risk

Affected muscles were assessed for both primary and secondary outcomes

  1. The risk of bias was assessed according to the methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration.
  2. ITT, Intention-to-treat; PP, Per-protocol.