This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Time-dependent parameter of perfusion imaging as independent predictor of clinical outcome in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
© Mundiyanapurath et al. 2016
Received: 3 October 2015
Accepted: 14 April 2016
Published: 19 April 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yoshiaki Kumon|
|11 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nils Daniel Forkert|
|28 Dec 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Sibu Mundiyanapurath|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Dec 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nils Daniel Forkert|
|8 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Sibu Mundiyanapurath|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Sibu Mundiyanapurath|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Apr 2016||Editorially accepted|
|19 Apr 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12883-016-0576-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.