This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Conjunctival microcirculatory blood flow is altered but not abolished in brain dead patients: a prospective observational study
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 3 December 2015
Accepted: 9 June 2016
Published: 11 July 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - M-Alain Babi|
|13 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anuska V. Andjelkovic-Zochowski|
|8 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Tomas Tamosuitis|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - M-Alain Babi|
|16 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anuska V. Andjelkovic-Zochowski|
|29 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Tomas Tamosuitis|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jun 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Tomas Tamosuitis|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Jun 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Jun 2016||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jul 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12883-016-0618-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.