This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Short-term test-retest-reliability of conditioned pain modulation using the cold-heat-pain method in healthy subjects and its correlation to parameters of standardized quantitative sensory testing
- Julia Gehling†1,
- Tina Mainka†1, 2,
- Jan Vollert1,
- Esther M. Pogatzki-Zahn3,
- Christoph Maier1 and
- Elena K. Enax-Krumova4Email author
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 12 December 2015
Accepted: 27 July 2016
Published: 5 August 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Falk Dincklage|
|9 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - José Biurrun Manresa|
|30 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Julia Gehling|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Falk Dincklage|
|19 Jul 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Julia Gehling|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Jul 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Jul 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Julia Gehling|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Jul 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Jul 2016||Editorially accepted|
|5 Aug 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12883-016-0650-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.