Table 4 Correlational analyses between CPM effects and QST parameters at day 1 and day 2
|  | Pearson’s correlation coefficient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | QST vs. early CPM effect day 1 | QST vs. early CPM effect day 2 | QST vs. late CPM effect day 1 | QST vs. late CPM effect day 2 | |
CDT (log) | total | 0.008 (p = 0.969) | −0.080 (p = 0.704) | −0.143 (p = 0.497) | 0.311 (p = 0.131) |
WDT (log) | total | −0.175 (p = 0.402) | −0.017 (p = 0.935) | −0.125 (p = 0.553) | −0.133 (p = 0.528) |
TSL (log) | total | −0.136 (p = 0.517) | −0.096 (p = 0.648) | 0.108 (p = 0.608) | 0.088 (p = 0.675) |
CPT (°C) | total | 0.059 (p = 0.778) | 0.158 (p = 0.449) | 0.055 (p = 0.795) | 0.349 (p = 0.088) |
HPT (°C) | total | −0.103 (p = 0.624) | −0.087 (p = 0.679) | 0.065 (p = 0.757) | −0.401 (p = 0.047) |
MDT (log) | total | −0.103 (p = 0.624) | 0.042 (p = 0.840) | 0.057 (p = 0.787) | 0.122 (p = 0.561) |
MPT (log) | total | 0.210 (p = 0.314) | −0.020 (p = 0.923) | 0.203 (p = 0.330) | −0.213 (p = 0.308) |
MPS (log) | total | 0.049 (p = 0.815) | −0.202 (p = 0.333) | −0.142 (p = 0.500) | 0.020 (p = 0.926) |
WUR (log) | total | −0.118 (p = 0.574) | −0.200 (p = 0.338) | −0.042 (p = 0.843) | 0.211 (p = 0.312) |
VDT (n/8) | total | 0.317 (p = 0.122) | 0.336 (p = 0.100) | 0.217 (p = 0.297) | −0.129 (p = 0.538) |
PPT (log) | total | −0.085 (p = 0.687) | −0.011 (p = 0.959) | 0.184 (p = 0.380) | −0.337 (p = 0.100) |