| MLPA + multiplex PCR/Real-time PCR (%) | Sequencing/Real-time PCR (%) |
χ
2
| P value* |
---|
+/+a | −/+ b | +/− c | −/− d | +/+ e | −/+ f | +/− g | −/− h |
---|
NAIP (exon4) | 9 (3.7) | 3 (1.2) | 0 | 229 (95.1) | Â | Â | Â | Â | 3.0 | 0.0833 |
NAIP (exon5) | 6 (2.5) | 2 (0.8) | 0 | 233 (96.7) | Â | Â | Â | Â | 2.0 | 0.1573 |
GTF2H2 (exon10) | 3 (1.2) | 2 (0.8) | 0 | 236 (98.8) | Â | Â | Â | Â | 2.0 | 0.1573 |
SMN | Â | Â | Â | Â | 70 (29.1) | 0 | 1 (0.4) | 170 (70.5) | 1.0 | 0.3173 |
- aThere were exons deletion of NAIP or GTF2H2 detected for both methods, meaning true positive for real-time PCR compared with MLPA + multiplex PCR
- bThere was no exon deletion of NAIP or GTF2H2 detected by MLPA + multiplex PCR but an exon deletion detected by real-time PCR, meaning false positive for real-time PCR compared with MLPA + multiplex PCR
- cThere was exon deletion of NAIP or GTF2H2 detected by MLPA + multiplex PCR but not detected by real-time PCR, meaning false negative for real-time PCR compared with MLPA + multiplex PCR
- dThere was no exon deletion for both MLPA + multiplex PCR and real-time PCR, meaning true negative for real-time PCR compared with MLPA + multiplex PCR
- eThere was homozygous mutation on SMN c.840 C > T for both methods, meaning true positive for real-time PCR compared with DNA sequencing
- fThere was no homozygous mutation on SMN c.840 C > T detected by Sanger DNA sequencing but detected by real-time PCR, meaning false positive for real-time PCR compared with DNA sequencing
- gThere was homozygous mutation on SMN c.840 C > T for Sanger DNA sequencing but not detected by real-time PCR, meaning false negative for real-time PCR compared with DNA sequencing
- hThere were normal and heterozygous mutation on SMN c.840 C > T for both Sanger DNA sequencing and real-time PCR, meaning true negative for real-time PCR compared with DNA sequencing
- *McNemar test