Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Intrathecal synthesis of anti-Hu antibodies distinguishes patients with paraneoplastic peripheral neuropathy and encephalitis

  • Philipp Schwenkenbecher1,
  • Lisa Priya Chacko1,
  • Ulrich Wurster1,
  • Kaweh Pars1,
  • Refik Pul1,
  • Kurt-Wolfram Sühs1,
  • Martin Stangel1 and
  • Thomas Skripuletz1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC NeurologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:136

Received: 1 May 2016

Accepted: 2 August 2016

Published: 11 August 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
1 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Aug 2016 Editorially accepted
11 Aug 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12883-016-0657-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neurochemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany