Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Urgent referral for suspected CNS cancer: which clinical features are associated with a positive predictive value of 3 % or more?

  • Hasan Raza Mohammad1, 2Email author,
  • Jeremy Boardman1,
  • Laura Howell3,
  • Roger J. Mills1 and
  • Hedley C. A. Emsley1, 2
BMC NeurologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:152

Received: 1 June 2016

Accepted: 17 August 2016

Published: 26 August 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
1 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Aug 2016 Editorially accepted
26 Aug 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12883-016-0677-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neurology, Royal Preston Hospital, Fulwood, UK
Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
College of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK