Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of TOAST and CISS subtypes, as performed by neurologist A

From: Comparison of the Chinese ischemic stroke subclassification and Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment systems in minor stroke

  TOAST CISS TOAST VS CISS
Frequency Percent (%) Frequency Percent (%) @ P
LAA 79 24.7 142 44.4 +79.7 % <0.001*
CE/CS 15 4.7 13 4.1 −13 % 0.69
SAO/PAD 123 38.4 137 42.8 +11.3 % 0.26
SOE/OE 6 1.9 6 1.9 ± -
SUE/UE 97 30.3 22 6.9 −77.3 % <0.001*
Total 320 100.0 320 100.0 ± -
  1. CISS Chinese ischemic stroke subclassfication, TOAST trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment, LAA large artery atherosclerosis, CE cardioembolism, CS cardiogenic stroke, SAO small-artery occlusion, PAD penetrating artery disease, SOE stroke of other etiologies, OE other etiologies, SUE stroke of undetermined etiology, UE undetermined etiology
  2. @ indicate relative change between two classifications
  3. *P < 0.001