Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of TOAST and CISS subtypes, as performed by neurologist A

From: Comparison of the Chinese ischemic stroke subclassification and Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment systems in minor stroke

 

TOAST

CISS

TOAST VS CISS

Frequency

Percent (%)

Frequency

Percent (%)

@

P

LAA

79

24.7

142

44.4

+79.7 %

<0.001*

CE/CS

15

4.7

13

4.1

−13 %

0.69

SAO/PAD

123

38.4

137

42.8

+11.3 %

0.26

SOE/OE

6

1.9

6

1.9

±

-

SUE/UE

97

30.3

22

6.9

−77.3 %

<0.001*

Total

320

100.0

320

100.0

±

-

  1. CISS Chinese ischemic stroke subclassfication, TOAST trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment, LAA large artery atherosclerosis, CE cardioembolism, CS cardiogenic stroke, SAO small-artery occlusion, PAD penetrating artery disease, SOE stroke of other etiologies, OE other etiologies, SUE stroke of undetermined etiology, UE undetermined etiology
  2. @ indicate relative change between two classifications
  3. *P < 0.001
Back to article page

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us