Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The relation between angioarchitectural factors of developmental venous anomaly and concomitant sporadic cavernous malformation

  • Tengfei Yu1,
  • Xing Liu1,
  • Xiangjiang Lin1,
  • Chuanfeng Bai1,
  • Jizong Zhao1,
  • Junting Zhang1,
  • Liwei Zhang1,
  • Zhen Wu1,
  • Shuo Wang1,
  • Yuanli Zhao1 and
  • Guolu Meng1Email author
BMC NeurologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:183

Received: 19 March 2016

Accepted: 29 August 2016

Published: 22 September 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
19 Mar 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Aug 2016 Editorially accepted
22 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12883-016-0691-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Capital Medical University, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine for Cerebrovascular Disease, Beijing, People’s Republic of China