Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparative evaluation of patients’ and physicians’ satisfaction with interferon beta-1b therapy

  • Uwe Klaus Zettl1,
  • Ulrike Bauer-Steinhusen2,
  • Thomas Glaser2,
  • Klaus Hechenbichler3,
  • Michael Hecker1Email author and
  • for the Study Group
BMC NeurologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:181

Received: 8 January 2016

Accepted: 15 September 2016

Published: 21 September 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Jan 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Sep 2016 Editorially accepted
21 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12883-016-0705-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunology Section, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
Neurology, Immunology, and Ophthalmology, Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany
Institute Dr. Schauerte, Munich, Germany