Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The relevance of cortical lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis

  • Olivia Geisseler1, 2Email author,
  • Tobias Pflugshaupt3,
  • Ladina Bezzola4,
  • Katja Reuter1,
  • David Weller1,
  • Bernhard Schuknecht5,
  • Peter Brugger1 and
  • Michael Linnebank1, 6
BMC NeurologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:204

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0718-9

Received: 5 January 2016

Accepted: 12 October 2016

Published: 21 October 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Jan 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
12 Oct 2016 Editorially accepted
21 Oct 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12883-016-0718-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
(2)
Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
(3)
Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Center, Luzerner Kantonsspital/State Hospital, Lucerne 16, Switzerland
(4)
URPP Dynamics of Healthy Aging, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
(5)
Medizinisch Radiologisches Institut, Zurich, Switzerland
(6)
Department of Neurology, Helios-Klinik Hagen-Ambrock, Hagen, Germany

Advertisement