Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Is upper limb virtual reality training more intensive than conventional training for patients in the subacute phase after stroke? An analysis of treatment intensity and content

BMC NeurologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:219

Received: 31 May 2016

Accepted: 3 November 2016

Published: 11 November 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
31 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Nov 2016 Editorially accepted
11 Nov 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12883-016-0740-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Competence Center for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Hammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Hammel, Denmark
Rehabilitation Campus Sint-Ursula, Jessa Hospitals, Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium