Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a randomised, 52-week, open-label, safety study

  • Aaron I. Vinik1Email author,
  • Serge Perrot2,
  • Etta J. Vinik1,
  • Ladislav Pazdera3,
  • Hélène Jacobs4,
  • Malcolm Stoker4,
  • Stephen K. Long4, 8,
  • Robert J. Snijder4,
  • Marjolijne van der Stoep4,
  • Enrique Ortega5 and
  • Nathaniel Katz6, 7
BMC NeurologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:251

Received: 3 May 2016

Accepted: 10 November 2016

Published: 6 December 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
3 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Nov 2016 Editorially accepted
6 Dec 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12883-016-0752-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Eastern Virginia Medical School, Strelitz Diabetes Center, Norfolk, USA
Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
Vestra Clinics - Dedicated Research Clinics, Rychnov nad Kneznou, Czech Republic
Astellas Pharma Europe B. V, Leiden, The Netherlands
Hospital Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
Analgesic Solutions, Natick, USA
Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, USA
INC Research, Camberley, UK