Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Neurology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Content validity and clinical meaningfulness of the HFMSE in spinal muscular atrophy

  • Maria C. Pera1,
  • Giorgia Coratti1,
  • Nicola Forcina1,
  • Elena S. Mazzone1,
  • Mariacristina Scoto2,
  • Jacqueline Montes3,
  • Amy Pasternak4,
  • Anna Mayhew5,
  • Sonia Messina6,
  • Maria Sframeli6,
  • Marion Main2,
  • Robert Muni Lofra5,
  • Tina Duong7,
  • Danielle Ramsey2,
  • Sally Dunaway3,
  • Rachel Salazar3,
  • Lavinia Fanelli1,
  • Matthew Civitello8,
  • Roberto de Sanctis1,
  • Laura Antonaci1,
  • Leonardo Lapenta1,
  • Simona Lucibello1,
  • Marika Pane1,
  • John Day7,
  • Basil T. Darras4,
  • Darryl C. De Vivo3,
  • Francesco Muntoni2,
  • Richard Finkel8 and
  • Eugenio Mercuri1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
BMC NeurologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:39

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-017-0790-9

Received: 5 August 2016

Accepted: 5 January 2017

Published: 23 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Farrar
8 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carole Vuillerot
12 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Müller-Felber
3 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Maria Carmela Pera
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Farrar
1 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Müller-Felber
9 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Maria Carmela Pera
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Maria Carmela Pera
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
23 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12883-017-0790-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pediatric Neurology, Catholic University
(2)
Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, UCL Institute of Child Health & Great Ormond Street Hospital
(3)
Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center
(4)
Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School
(5)
John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University
(6)
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Nemo Sud Clinical Center, University of Messina
(7)
Stanford University
(8)
Nemours Children’s Hospital, University of Central Florida College of Medicine

Advertisement