Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Content validity and clinical meaningfulness of the HFMSE in spinal muscular atrophy

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Farrar
8 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carole Vuillerot
12 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Müller-Felber
3 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Maria Carmela Pera
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Farrar
1 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Müller-Felber
9 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Maria Carmela Pera
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Maria Carmela Pera
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
23 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12883-017-0790-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement