This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Why use a mirror to assess visual pursuit in prolonged disorders of consciousness? Evidence from healthy control participants
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 21 October 2016
Accepted: 15 January 2017
Published: 24 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Bernat|
|30 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sergio Bagnato|
|30 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lizette Heine|
|16 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Damian Cruse|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Bernat|
|21 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sergio Bagnato|
|3 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lizette Heine|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|24 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12883-017-0798-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.