Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Functional outcome and complications after the microsurgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a retrospective review of 16-year experience in a single hospital

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dong Zhong
10 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tao Hong
24 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Xing Liu
23 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Xiang Huang
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Xing Liu
10 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dong Zhong
15 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiang Huang
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
20 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
31 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12883-017-0805-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement