This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Functional outcome and complications after the microsurgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a retrospective review of 16-year experience in a single hospital
- Xiang Huang†1,
- Jian Xu†1,
- Ming Xu1,
- Mingyu Chen1,
- Kaiyuan Ji1,
- Junwei Ren1 and
- Ping Zhong1Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 20 October 2016
Accepted: 20 January 2017
Published: 31 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dong Zhong|
|10 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tao Hong|
|24 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xing Liu|
|23 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Xiang Huang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xing Liu|
|10 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dong Zhong|
|15 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Xiang Huang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|31 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12883-017-0805-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.