Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A rare case of bilateral cervical vagal neurofibromas: role of high-resolution ultrasound

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zhe Zhu
31 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kajetan von Eckardstein
14 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Bin Liu
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zhe Zhu
10 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kajetan von Eckardstein
10 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Bin Liu
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kajetan von Eckardstein
20 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zhe Zhu
9 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Bin Liu
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bin Liu
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12883-017-0806-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement