Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview of the process evaluation involving process outcomes and barriers and facilitators, targeted groups and data collection methods

From: Evaluation and implementation of highly challenging balance training in clinical practice for people with Parkinson’s disease: protocol for the HiBalance effectiveness-implementation trial

Process outcomesa

Targeted groups

Method of data collection

Fidelity

Patient training diaries/attendance

Physical therapist trainers sessions plans

Assessment of group training protocols

Focus group interviews

Dose

Physical therapist trainers (dose provided)

Participants with PD

(dose received)

Assessment of group training protocols

Assessment of attendance at group training/home training protocols

Recruitment

Physical therapist trainers

Study logs and focus group interviews

Reach

Participants with PD

Study logs

Barriers and facilitatorsb

Targeted groups

Method of data collection

Knowledge and beliefs about the program

Relative advantage of the program

Need for adaptability of the program

Self-efficacy to train patients according to the programs core components

Perceived complexity/difficulty of implementing the program in everyday practice

Physical therapist trainers

Focus group interviews

Patients need and resources

Knowledge and beliefs about the balance program

Perceived complexity of performing the training

Participants with PD

Structured questionnaire

  1. aGuided UK Medical research council guidelines. bGuided by constructs defined by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research