This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A comparison of central nervous system involvement in patients with classical Fabry disease or the later-onset subtype with the IVS4+919G>A mutation
- Han-Jui Lee†1, 2,
- Ting-Rong Hsu†3, 4,
- Sheng-Che Hung1, 2, 5Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Wen-Chung Yu2, 6,
- Tzu-Hung Chu2, 4,
- Chia-Feng Yang2, 4,
- Svetlana Bizjajeva7,
- Chui-Mei Tiu1, 2 and
- Dau-Ming Niu3, 4Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 22 April 2016
Accepted: 26 January 2017
Published: 6 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dawn A Laney|
|26 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hiroaki Adachi|
|2 Sep 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Han-Jui Lee|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Sep 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hiroaki Adachi|
|23 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Han-Jui Lee|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12883-017-0810-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.