This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Development and validation of a score for evaluating comprehensive stroke care capabilities: J-ASPECT Study
- Akiko Kada1Email author,
- Kunihiro Nishimura2,
- Jyoji Nakagawara3,
- Kuniaki Ogasawara4,
- Junichi Ono5,
- Yoshiaki Shiokawa6,
- Toru Aruga7,
- Shigeru Miyachi8,
- Izumi Nagata9,
- Kazunori Toyoda10,
- Shinya Matsuda11,
- Akifumi Suzuki12,
- Hiroharu Kataoka13,
- Fumiaki Nakamura2,
- Satoru Kamitani14,
- Koji Iihara15 and
- the J-ASPECT Study Collaborators
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 25 July 2016
Accepted: 8 February 2017
Published: 28 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris Streib|
|14 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Akiko Kada|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12883-017-0815-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.